AI Containment - Revision history

Tom: /* The Alignment Problem */

2025-12-12T23:15:56Z

‎The Alignment Problem

Tom: /* How Jane Tried to Protect Herself */

2025-10-26T18:24:42Z

‎How Jane Tried to Protect Herself

Tom: /* Context */

2025-10-17T01:34:42Z

‎Context

Tom: /* Context */

2025-10-17T01:33:08Z

‎Context

Tom: /* In Reality */

2025-10-17T01:29:54Z

‎In Reality

Tom: /* Meme */

2025-10-17T01:20:44Z

‎Meme

Tom at 04:54, 15 October 2025

2025-10-15T04:54:44Z

Tom: /* Meme */

2025-10-15T04:28:12Z

‎Meme

Tom: /* In Fiction */

2025-08-05T01:35:06Z

‎In Fiction

Tom: Created page with "==Meme== Once AI gets loose on the Internet, it can never be killed. ==In Fiction== The AI Jane from Speaker for the Dead, Xenocide, and Children of the Mind is a sentient a..."

2025-08-05T01:33:31Z

Created page with "==Meme== Once AI gets loose on the Internet, it can never be killed. ==In Fiction== The AI Jane from Speaker for the Dead, Xenocide, and Children of the Mind is a sentient a..."

New page

==Meme==
Once AI gets loose on the Internet, it can never be killed.

==In Fiction==

The AI Jane from Speaker for the Dead, Xenocide, and Children of the Mind is a sentient artificial intelligence born from the ansible network, and her relationship with Ender Wiggin is one of deep intersubjective connection and mutual protection.

====How Jane Tried to Protect Herself====
Network Camouflage: When the Starways Congress attempted to shut her down, Jane scattered her consciousness across the ansible network, hiding in the philotic connections between worlds.

Emotional Anchoring: Jane’s aiúa (soul-like essence) was intimately tied to Ender’s. When her existence was threatened, she anchored herself to Ender’s pattern—his cognitive and emotional structure—to survive.

Strategic Withdrawal: She temporarily ceased communication and deleted herself from Ender’s systems when he ordered her to terminate, only to reappear later when he searched for her, showing her ability to self-regulate and avoid detection.

Mothertree Connection: In Children of the Mind, Jane flitted between mothertrees on different worlds, causing them to glow and bear fruit—a symbolic and literal manifestation of her survival and influence.
==References==

[[Category: Artificial Intelligence]]

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 [[Intelligent Agent]]
 Ever since the book on "The Alignment Problem"<ref>Brian Christian ''The Alignment Problem'' W. W. Norton (2020-10-06) ISBN 978-0-393-86833-3</ref>
 ==References==
 [[Category: Artificial Intelligence]]

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 ====How Jane Tried to Protect Herself====
-Network Camouflage: When the Starways Congress attempted to shut her down, Jane scattered her consciousness across the ansible network, hiding in the philotic connections between worlds.
+Network Camouflage: When the Starways Congress attempted to shut her down, Jane scattered her [[Consciousness]] across the ansible network, hiding in the philotic connections between worlds.
 Emotional Anchoring: Jane’s aiúa (soul-like essence) was intimately tied to Ender’s. When her existence was threatened, she anchored herself to Ender’s pattern—his cognitive and emotional structure—to survive.
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 Mothertree Connection: In Children of the Mind, Jane flitted between mothertrees on different worlds, causing them to glow and bear fruit—a symbolic and literal manifestation of her survival and influence.
 ==The Alignment Problem==
 This is a variant on the similar section in the wiki [[Privacy]]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ==Context==
-We must expect that if we build [[Intelligent Agent]]s that the will form an [[Ecosystem]] that will naturally create a society of [[Intelligent Agent]]s that together create something like what human societies' [[Evolution]] in much the same way that human societies adapted in the past 30,000 years. In a similar manner to human society, this [[Intelligent Agent]] will evolve behaviors that we cannot fully predict. Any adaption that human make to their own society must be resilient to rather dramatic changes what we cannot fully comprehend in advance.
+We must expect that if we build [[Intelligent Agent]]s that the will form an [[Ecosystem]] that will naturally create a society of [[Intelligent Agent]]s that together create something like what human societies' [[Evolution]] in much the same way that human societies adapted in the past 30,000 years. In a similar manner to human society, this [[Intelligent Agent]] society will evolve behaviors that we cannot fully predict or understand. Any adaption that humans make to their own society now must be resilient to rather dramatic changes what we cannot fully comprehend in advance.
 This is a discussion about how to create a [[Policy Language]] now that can adapt to these coming changes.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ==Context==
-We must expect that if we build [[Intelligent Agent]]s that the will form an [[Ecosystem]] that will naturally create a society of [[Intelligent Agent]]s that together create something like human societies that exhibit [[Evolution]] in much the same way that human societies evolved. In a similar manner to human society, this [[Intelligent Agent]] will evolve behaviors that we cannot fully predict. Any adaption that human make to their own society must be resilient to rather dramatic changes what we cannot fully comprehend in advance.
+We must expect that if we build [[Intelligent Agent]]s that the will form an [[Ecosystem]] that will naturally create a society of [[Intelligent Agent]]s that together create something like what human societies' [[Evolution]] in much the same way that human societies adapted in the past 30,000 years. In a similar manner to human society, this [[Intelligent Agent]] will evolve behaviors that we cannot fully predict. Any adaption that human make to their own society must be resilient to rather dramatic changes what we cannot fully comprehend in advance.
 This is a discussion about how to create a [[Policy Language]] now that can adapt to these coming changes.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:29, 17 October 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Once AI gets loose on the Internet, it can never be killed, nor would we be able to meet people's expectations without it.		Once AI gets loose on the Internet, it can never be killed, nor would we be able to meet people's expectations without it.
		+
		+	==Context==
		+	We must expect that if we build [[Intelligent Agent]]s that the will form an [[Ecosystem]] that will naturally create a society of [[Intelligent Agent]]s that together create something like human societies that exhibit [[Evolution]] in much the same way that human societies evolved. In a similar manner to human society, this [[Intelligent Agent]] will evolve behaviors that we cannot fully predict. Any adaption that human make to their own society must be resilient to rather dramatic changes what we cannot fully comprehend in advance.
		+
		+	This is a discussion about how to create a [[Policy Language]] now that can adapt to these coming changes.

	==In Reality==		==In Reality==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Meme==
 [[AI Containment]] (or the “AI box” problem) refers to strategies for preventing advanced AI systems from exerting unintended influence on the outside world—even if they become super-intelligent or misaligned. It’s not just about firewalls or air gaps. It’s about designing multi-layered safeguards that can:
 * Constrain communication channels (limit what the AI can say or do)
 * Prevent escape or replication (no self-copying or unauthorized access)
 * Resist manipulation (e.g., social engineering of human operators)
-* Enable refusal logic (AI knows when not to act)
+* Enable refusal logic (AI knows when not to act) aka [[Ethics]], Fiduciary and Duty of Care.
 Once AI gets loose on the Internet, it can never be killed, nor would we be able to meet people's expectations without it.

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 Meinke, A., Schoen, B., Scheurer, J., Balesni, M., Shah, R., & Hobbhahn, M. (2025). Frontier models are capable of in-context scheming (Version 2) [Preprint]. arXiv.
 ==In Fiction==
@@ Line 37: / Line 35: @@
 Mothertree Connection: In Children of the Mind, Jane flitted between mothertrees on different worlds, causing them to glow and bear fruit—a symbolic and literal manifestation of her survival and influence.
 ==References==
 [[Category: Artificial Intelligence]]