Being Digital - Revision history

Tom: /* References */

2025-09-14T17:50:35Z

‎References

2025-08-14T05:34:01Z

‎References

2025-07-28T01:17:08Z

‎Right to have Digital Being

2025-07-28T01:14:35Z

‎Right to have Digital Being

2025-07-28T01:14:08Z

‎Right to have Digital Being

2025-07-28T01:08:04Z

‎Being Human

2025-07-28T01:02:51Z

‎Nat's Proposal

2025-07-28T01:00:45Z

‎Digital Twin

2025-03-04T23:14:16Z

‎Being Human

2025-03-04T23:10:57Z

‎Everyone benefits

@@ Line 256: / Line 256: @@
 [[Category: Identity]]
 [[Category: Model]]
 [[Category: Human Rights]]

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 # They need to be able to send and receive signed messages among themselves.
 # If a dispute occurs, the person controlling the digital being must be accountable for it.
-# When one’s digital being fails (e.g., for technical or operational reasons), he should be able to re-establish it.  This is not warranted yet. Many people still do not have access to the internet, and as a result, they do not or cannot have Digital Being. So, this aspect needs to be addressed, see the wiki [[Digital Inclusion]] for details.
+# When one’s digital being fails (e.g., for technical or operational reasons), he should be able to re-establish it.  This is not warranted yet. Many people still do not have access to the internet, and as a result, they do not or cannot have Digital Being. See the wiki [[Digital Inclusion]] for details.
-This wiki page focuses on the desirable properties of Digital Being in the following seven principles:
+This wiki page, [[Being Digital]], focuses on the desirable properties of Digital Being in the following seven principles:
 # Accountable Digital Being
 # Expressive Digital Being

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 # Human Friendly
 # Adoption-Friendly
 # Everyone benefits
 ===Accountable Digital Being===

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 # They need to be able to send and receive signed messages among themselves.
 # If a dispute occurs, the person controlling the digital being must be accountable for it.
-# When one’s digital being fails (e.g., for technical or operational reasons), he should be able to re-establish it.
+# When one’s digital being fails (e.g., for technical or operational reasons), he should be able to re-establish it.  This is not warranted yet. Many people still do not have access to the internet, and as a result, they do not or cannot have Digital Being. So, this aspect needs to be addressed, see the wiki [[Digital Inclusion]] for details.
-Mind you. This is not warranted yet. Many people still do not have access to the internet, and as a result, they do not or cannot have Digital Being. So, this aspect needs to be addressed, but I am not doing it today. Instead, I am focusing on the desirable properties of Digital Being. It is still a work in progress, but I have summarized it in the following seven principles:
+This wiki page focuses on the desirable properties of Digital Being in the following seven principles:
 # Accountable Digital Being
 # Expressive Digital Being
@@ Line 45: / Line 44: @@
 # Adoption-Friendly
 # Everyone benefits
 Let me go over one by one.
 ===Accountable Digital Being===

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 This page focuses on the art of prospering in an increasingly Digital Ecosystem.
 * See the wiki on [[Being a Person]]
 ==Nat's Proposal==

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 It is clear then that we have to be warranted to be able to create and control Digital Beings. I would say:
-Right to have Digital Being.
+===Right to have Digital Being===
 It is a mirror concept to Right to Life in the real world. If you cannot have a Digital Being, you cannot live in the digital world. So, anyone should be able to establish and re-establish one’s trusted digital being. For the communication to be trusted and secure, each entity needs to be able to identify each other with the “digital name” and open secure communication channels between them. That means

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 * In its broadest sense, a Digital Twin is a simulation of a real-world [[Entity]] with a digital representative of that entity that can simulate how the real-world entity would react. It is also known as a digital simulation or a imitation. It was first used in the aerospace industry to model how various aircraft would perform, particularly in cases of handling failures.<ref>Elisa Negri, ''A Review of the Roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based Production Systems'' (2017-08(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978917304067?via%3Dihub</ref> In this page we focus on human beings who are typically exhibit [[Consciousness]] and so the advent of [[Artificial Intelligence]] leads to the idea that a digital twin of a human being might soon be possible.<ref>Robert Mitwicki, ''Self Actioning System, a preferred systemic embodiment of “Digital Self”'' (2023-07-27) https://humancolossus.foundation/blog/nbspai-governance-starts-with-data-governancenbsp-atttk</ref>
 * See the wiki page on [[Digital Twin]] for more details on this.
 ==Being Human==

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 4 March 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Being Human==		==Being Human==
		+	This page focuses on the art of prospering in an increasingly Digital Ecosystem.
	* See the wiki on [[Being a Person]]		* See the wiki on [[Being a Person]]

@@ Line 241: / Line 241: @@
 ===Everyone benefits===
-　The last principle, "everyone benefits", is not often mentioned, but it is a very important one. Environmental change that comes at the expense of a few is difficult to implement, and even when it is implemented, it does not last.
+　The last principle, "everyone benefits", is not often mentioned, but it is a very important one. Environmental change that comes at the expense of a few is difficult to implement, and even when it is implemented, it does not last  See the wiki page on [[Digital Inclusion]] for more on making the Digital Ecosystem more successful.
 　When privacy is a priority, it can be easy to focus on strengthening individual rights, and when efficiency is a priority from a business perspective, individual rights can be seen as a distraction. However, any attempt to strike an imbalance is likely to be met with fierce opposition, resulting in a situation where the status quo is maintained or even worsened. It is also unethical to allow the tyranny of the majority to overwhelm the minority and allow the majority to profit.