Causal Invariance - Revision history

Tom: /* Problems */

2023-12-15T01:58:29Z

‎Problems

2023-12-15T01:56:59Z

‎Problems

2023-12-15T01:55:23Z

‎Context

2023-12-15T01:38:18Z

‎Context

2023-12-15T01:37:22Z

‎Context

2023-12-15T01:36:56Z

‎Context

2023-12-15T01:33:55Z

‎Context

2023-12-15T01:33:00Z

‎Context

2023-12-15T01:31:29Z

‎Context

2023-12-15T01:29:44Z

‎Context

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ==Problems==
 * Any scientific theory needs to be falsifiable. That is, there must exist, at least in concept, some test that can prove that it is false if the test fails. So [[Causal Invariance]] is not a theory, but a road map to a theory.
-* If [[Causal Invariance]] is true, there really is no reason to run the program that we call the universe, unless the universe is nothing more that a test to see if some theory is correct. For example, the universe is a test to see if Intelligence can arise from chaos.
+* If [[Causal Invariance]] is true, there really is no reason to run the program that we call the universe, unless the universe is nothing more that a test to see if some theory is correct. For example, the universe is a test to see if Intelligence can arise from chaos. Although it is not evident that humans are intelligent enough to call the project a success.
 ==References==
 [[Category: Physics]]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ==Problems==
 * Any scientific theory needs to be falsifiable. That is, there must exist, at least in concept, some test that can prove that it is false if the test fails. So [[Causal Invariance]] is not a theory, but a road map to a theory.
-* If [[Causal Invariance]] is true, there really is no reason to run the program that we can the universe, unless the universe is nothing more that a test to see if some theory is correct. For example, the universe is a test to see if Intelligence can arise from chaos.
+* If [[Causal Invariance]] is true, there really is no reason to run the program that we call the universe, unless the universe is nothing more that a test to see if some theory is correct. For example, the universe is a test to see if Intelligence can arise from chaos.
 ==References==
 [[Category: Physics]]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 So what I can do is create a game that explores this idea of network connectivity in the way that the game of life explored cellular automata.
 ==References==
 [[Category: Physics]]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 The result seems to say that Bells inequality is wrong, but what it really says is that local reality isn't what you think it is. There can be network edges that extend clear across the universe from one entangled particle to its twin entangling there destiny as they evolve over time.
-So what I can do is create a game that explores this idea of network connectivity like the game of life explored cellular automata.
+So what I can do is create a game that explores this idea of network connectivity in the way that the game of life explored cellular automata.
 ==References==
 [[Category: Physics]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==Context==
-Stephen Wolfram 2020 opus describe the way that a directed graph can be used as the source of all that exists in the universe.<ref>Stephen Wolfram, ''A project to Find the Fundamental Theory of Physics'' (2023-06-19) ISBN 9781579550356</ref>
+Stephen Wolfram's 2020 opus describe the way that a directed graph can be used as the source of all that exists in the universe.<ref>Stephen Wolfram, ''A project to Find the Fundamental Theory of Physics'' (2023-06-19) ISBN 9781579550356</ref>
 The result seems to say that Bells inequality is wrong, but what it really says is that local reality isn't what you think it is. There can be network edges that extend clear across the universe from one entangled particle to its twin entangling there destiny as they evolve over time.

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==Context==
-Stephen Wolfram<ref>Stephen Wolfram, ''A project to Find the Fundamental Theory of Physics'' (2023) ISBN 9781570550356</ref>
+Stephen Wolfram new opus describe the way that a directed graph can be used as the source of all that exists in the universe.<ref>Stephen Wolfram, ''A project to Find the Fundamental Theory of Physics'' (2023) ISBN 9781570550356</ref>
 Seems to say that bells inequality is wrong, but what it really says is that local reality is what you think it is. There can be network edges that extend clear across the universe