Consent - Revision history

Tom: /* The Consent Record */

2025-05-21T15:50:59Z

‎The Consent Record

2025-04-16T19:49:46Z

‎Problems

2025-04-16T19:39:41Z

‎Problems

2025-04-16T19:37:33Z

‎Problems

2025-03-12T18:19:54Z

‎Full Title or Meme

2025-03-12T18:12:38Z

‎Problems

2025-02-09T20:56:15Z

‎Full Title or Meme

2025-01-08T23:08:05Z

‎Problems

2023-08-08T22:45:17Z

‎The Consent Record

2023-07-28T05:02:25Z

‎The Taxonomy

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 ===The Consent Record===
 The Consent Record described in ISO 27560 is a data structure that can be encoded as a verifiable credential.
 ===Data Rights Protocol===
 * [https://github.com/consumer-reports-innovation-lab/data-rights-protocol On GitHub]

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 ==Problems==
-* An individual is nearly powerless against a large organization, be it a feudal barony or a large corporation. Since baronies and corporations where given the patina of legality, they have abused individual humans for all of recorded history.
+* An [[Individual]] is nearly powerless against a large organization, be it a feudal barony or a large corporation. Since baronies and corporations where given the patina of legality, they have abused individual humans for all of recorded history.
 * Individuality as imagined by Hobbes and Luther has turned into a mind-altering drug that provide the illusion of freedom with none of the benefits. Burke, however, predicts that any society that tried full equality would rapidly sink into a hidden version of inequality as happens in Orwell's ''Animal Farm''.
 *It's easy to say that the user should have control of their own data, it's hard to capture the fact. Facebook and Google refuse to provide their service if you don't given the consent to store your entire life online. That is not really a choice for most people that use the internet daily.

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 ==Problems==
-* An individual is nearly powerless against a large organization, beit a feudal barony or a large corporation. Since baronies and corporations where given the patina of legality, they have abused individual humans for all of recorded history.
+* An individual is nearly powerless against a large organization, be it a feudal barony or a large corporation. Since baronies and corporations where given the patina of legality, they have abused individual humans for all of recorded history.
 * Individuality as imagined by Hobbes and Luther has turned into a mind-altering drug that provide the illusion of freedom with none of the benefits. Burke, however, predicts that any society that tried full equality would rapidly sink into a hidden version of inequality as happens in Orwell's ''Animal Farm''.
 *It's easy to say that the user should have control of their own data, it's hard to capture the fact. Facebook and Google refuse to provide their service if you don't given the consent to store your entire life online. That is not really a choice for most people that use the internet daily.

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 ==Problems==
 * An individual is nearly powerless against a large organization, beit a feudal barony or a large corporation. Since baronies and corporations where given the patina of legality, they have abused individual humans for all of recorded history.
-* Individuality as imagined by Hobbes and Luther has turned into a mind-alering drug that provide the illusion of freedeom with none of the benefits.
+* Individuality as imagined by Hobbes and Luther has turned into a mind-altering drug that provide the illusion of freedom with none of the benefits. Burke, however, predicts that any society that tried full equality would rapidly sink into a hidden version of inequality as happens in Orwell's ''Animal Farm''.
 *It's easy to say that the user should have control of their own data, it's hard to capture the fact. Facebook and Google refuse to provide their service if you don't given the consent to store your entire life online. That is not really a choice for most people that use the internet daily.
 *"Consent, in its purest form, could easily become a dystopian stick to control citizens with," Susan Morrow, doesn't pull her punches as she argues that GDPR hasn't resolved the conflict between choice and consent. <ref>Susan Morrow, ''50 shades of privacy: Consent and the fallacy that will prevent privacy for all.'' (2019-05) Information Age https://www.information-age.com/consent-privacy-gdpr-privacy-by-design-default-123482351/</ref>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Full Title or Meme==
-[[Consent]] is a process that the [[User]] undertakes at a [[Web Site]] to agree to some conditions of use of that site. Only some [[Artifact]] of the process can be used as proof that consent was freely given.
+[[Consent]] is a process that the [[User]] undertakes at a [[Web Site]] or on their [[Smartphone]] to agree to some conditions of use of that site or application. Only some [[Artifact]] of the process can be used as proof that consent was freely given.
 ==Terminology==
 There are two process that involve users allowing some site access to [[User Private Information]]. In the first case the site acquires the data in a separate operation and in the second the user provides that data and consent in a single bundle. <ref>Global Privacy Rights, ''CNIL -Permissions are to be Distinguished from the Collection of Consent'' https://www.globalprivacyrights.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=7</ref>

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 *"Consent, in its purest form, could easily become a dystopian stick to control citizens with," Susan Morrow, doesn't pull her punches as she argues that GDPR hasn't resolved the conflict between choice and consent. <ref>Susan Morrow, ''50 shades of privacy: Consent and the fallacy that will prevent privacy for all.'' (2019-05) Information Age https://www.information-age.com/consent-privacy-gdpr-privacy-by-design-default-123482351/</ref>
 * In view of the changing technology, like Artificial Intelligence, any enterprise is likely to see purposes shift over time. Since consent is ostensibly provided for a clearly articulated purpose it is unclear how this can be accommodated other than the ubiquitous terms of service which appear nearly every year from many of the enterprises that each of us deals with on a continuous basis.
 ==Solutions==

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 The question inevitably arises, "What is it that the User has agreed to Share?" This question implies that there is a taxonomy of shareable attributes that is equally understandable to (1) the user, (2) the data controller and (3) the regulatory agency that determines whether consent was actually given.
 * [https://www.w3.org/ns/dpv Data Privacy Vocabulary v0.1] seeks to provide such a taxonomy and even mentions consent, but the shear volume of taxa basically is too large to expect that users could possible understand the details even if they wanted to.
 ===The ISO Standard===