Consent Manifesto - Revision history

Tom at 05:06, 12 April 2024

2024-04-12T05:06:51Z

Tom: /* References */

2022-02-01T22:39:57Z

‎References

Tom: /* Other Material */

2020-08-26T19:17:57Z

‎Other Material

Tom: /* Solutions */

2019-11-28T15:24:49Z

‎Solutions

Tom: /* Solutions */

2019-11-28T15:23:59Z

‎Solutions

Tom: /* Context */

2019-11-28T15:22:04Z

‎Context

Tom: /* Context */

2019-11-05T19:25:12Z

‎Context

Tom: /* Context */

2019-11-05T19:20:27Z

‎Context

Tom: /* Context */

2019-11-05T17:33:40Z

‎Context

Tom: /* Context */

2019-11-05T17:33:06Z

‎Context

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 ===Other Material===
 * An early paper on User Centric Identity<ref>Kim Cameron +2, ''A User-Centric Identity Metasystem'' 2008-10-05 https://www.identityblog.com/wp-content/images/2009/06/UserCentricIdentityMetasystem.pdf</ref><blockquote>Information systems that co-operate to originate, control and consume identity information have been called identity systems. The evolution of the Internet requires increased interoperability of these systems. Such interoperability demands an abstract model that encompasses the characteristics of all co-operating identity systems. We call this abstract model the Identity Metasystem.</blockquote>
-* Consent on Campus: A Manifesto (2018-09-04) by Donna Freitas  ISBN 978-0190671150 is a completely different view of consent that is eerily similar to the relationship between users and corporations. <blockquote>A 2015 survey of twenty-seven elite colleges found that twenty-three percent of respondents reported personal experiences of sexual misconduct on their campuses. That figure has not changed since the 1980s, when people first began collecting data on sexual violence. What has changed is the level of attention that the American public is paying to these statistics. Reports of sexual abuse repeatedly make headlines, and universities are scrambling to address the crisis. 2015 survey of twenty-seven elite colleges found that twenty-three percent of respondents reported personal experiences of sexual misconduct on their campuses. That figure has not changed since the 1980s, when people first began collecting data on sexual violence. What has changed is the level of attention that the American public is paying to these statistics. Reports of sexual abuse repeatedly make headlines, and universities are scrambling to address the crisis.A 2015 survey of twenty-seven elite colleges found that twenty-three percent of respondents reported personal experiences of sexual misconduct on their campuses. That figure has not changed since the 1980s, when people first began collecting data on sexual violence. What has changed is the level of attention that the American public is paying to these statistics. Reports of sexual abuse repeatedly make headlines, and universities are scrambling to address the crisis.</blockquote>
+* Consent on Campus: A Manifesto (2018-09-04) by Donna Freitas  ISBN 978-0190671150 is a completely different view of consent that is eerily similar to the relationship between users and corporations. <blockquote>A 2015 survey of twenty-seven elite colleges found that twenty-three percent of respondents reported personal experiences of sexual misconduct on their campuses. That figure has not changed since the 1980s, when people first began collecting data on sexual violence. What has changed is the level of  [[Attention]] that the American public is paying to these statistics. Reports of sexual abuse repeatedly make headlines, and universities are scrambling to address the crisis. 2015 survey of twenty-seven elite colleges found that twenty-three percent of respondents reported personal experiences of sexual misconduct on their campuses. That figure has not changed since the 1980s, when people first began collecting data on sexual violence. What has changed is the level of  [[Attention]] that the American public is paying to these statistics. Reports of sexual abuse repeatedly make headlines, and universities are scrambling to address the crisis.A 2015 survey of twenty-seven elite colleges found that twenty-three percent of respondents reported personal experiences of sexual misconduct on their campuses. That figure has not changed since the 1980s, when people first began collecting data on sexual violence. What has changed is the level of  [[Attention]] that the American public is paying to these statistics. Reports of sexual abuse repeatedly make headlines, and universities are scrambling to address the crisis.</blockquote>
 *[https://hackylawyer.com/f/forget-erasure-why-blockchain-is-really-incompatible-with-gdpr Forget erasure: why blockchain is really incompatible with GDPR] by Elizabeth M. Renieris (2019-09-24)<blockquote>Participants tend to dive head first into debating technical and nuanced details about the implementation of specific features or functionality in a given network, often losing sight of the bigger picture. In this way, solving one discrete issue often makes another tension harder to resolve, in a never-ending game of compliance whack-a-mole. By abstracting to a higher-level discussion based on the core GDPR principles, we can see how blockchain is, at least as presently conceived, fundamentally at odds with the [GDPR] Regulation.</blockquote>

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 1 February 2022
Line 36:		Line 36:

	[[Category:Glossary]]		[[Category:Glossary]]
−	[[Category:Privacy]]	+	[[Category: Privacy]]
		+	[[Category: User Experience]]
		+	[[Category: Consent]]

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 ===Other Material===
 * Consent on Campus: A Manifesto (2018-09-04) by Donna Freitas  ISBN 978-0190671150 is a completely different view of consent that is eerily similar to the relationship between users and corporations. <blockquote>A 2015 survey of twenty-seven elite colleges found that twenty-three percent of respondents reported personal experiences of sexual misconduct on their campuses. That figure has not changed since the 1980s, when people first began collecting data on sexual violence. What has changed is the level of attention that the American public is paying to these statistics. Reports of sexual abuse repeatedly make headlines, and universities are scrambling to address the crisis. 2015 survey of twenty-seven elite colleges found that twenty-three percent of respondents reported personal experiences of sexual misconduct on their campuses. That figure has not changed since the 1980s, when people first began collecting data on sexual violence. What has changed is the level of attention that the American public is paying to these statistics. Reports of sexual abuse repeatedly make headlines, and universities are scrambling to address the crisis.A 2015 survey of twenty-seven elite colleges found that twenty-three percent of respondents reported personal experiences of sexual misconduct on their campuses. That figure has not changed since the 1980s, when people first began collecting data on sexual violence. What has changed is the level of attention that the American public is paying to these statistics. Reports of sexual abuse repeatedly make headlines, and universities are scrambling to address the crisis.</blockquote>
 *[https://hackylawyer.com/f/forget-erasure-why-blockchain-is-really-incompatible-with-gdpr Forget erasure: why blockchain is really incompatible with GDPR] by Elizabeth M. Renieris (2019-09-24)<blockquote>Participants tend to dive head first into debating technical and nuanced details about the implementation of specific features or functionality in a given network, often losing sight of the bigger picture. In this way, solving one discrete issue often makes another tension harder to resolve, in a never-ending game of compliance whack-a-mole. By abstracting to a higher-level discussion based on the core GDPR principles, we can see how blockchain is, at least as presently conceived, fundamentally at odds with the [GDPR] Regulation.</blockquote>

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 ==Solutions==
-Give the user an application that can be trusted to create secure connections with user secrets held securely in the phone.
+Give the user an application that can be trusted by web sites to create secure, authenticated connections with user secrets held securely in the phone.
 ==References==

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 ==Solutions==
-To come!
+Give the user an application that can be trusted to create secure connections with user secrets held securely in the phone.
 ==References==

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 # Looking at the way to make aal2, like FIDO & FIDO2 are useful, but cater to the company.
 # human-centric purposeful connection re-establishment methods give the human the best opportunity to control the on-going consent process.
-# The best method for achieving purposeful human-centric connection (IMHO)) is the smart phone (actually any internet connect device under the users intimate control)<blockquote>'</blockquote>
+# The best method for achieving purposeful human-centric connection (IMHO)) is the [https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php/Phone_as_Personal_Identifier_Provider#Full_Titlesmart phone] (actually any internet connected device under the users intimate control)
 ==Solutions==

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 # the simplest form of cred is the cookie placed on a device by a advertisement.
 # humans have here-to-fore hand little control of cookies,  It is time to change this is some manner.
-# there are (at least) two levels of assurance of the continuity (aka AAL1 and AAL2) in the first the human is very casual about the re-establishment of connectivity, in the second the human is purposeful in  the re-establishment of connectivity
+# there are (at least) two levels of assurance of the continuity (aka AAL1 and AAL2): in the first level the human is very casual about the re-establishment of connectivity, in the second level the human is purposeful in  the re-establishment of connectivity
 # The humans have better control as well as better security in AAL2.
 # Looking at the way to make aal2, like FIDO & FIDO2 are useful, but cater to the company.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ==Context==
 * The context is the World Wide Web as it exists today. Enterprises, both governmental and corporate have taken control in spite of all the grass roots attempts to enforce anarchy.
-* The user has had only one choice in this process and this is to not play the game. That take-it-or-leave approach to commercial transaction has been embedded in the contract of adhesion.
+* The user has had only one choice in this process and this is to not play the game. That take-it-or-leave approach to commercial transaction has been embedded in the [[Contract of Adhesion]].
 * The following theses are presented as propositions for debate concerned with the question of user consent in a connected collection of web interactions. It is past time for a reformation of the WWW.
 # While the internet was constructed as a fully distributed communications ecosystem, IP identity was only available from the fully centralized DNS.