Corroborated - Revision history

Tom at 21:57, 26 May 2024

2024-05-26T21:57:24Z

2024-05-26T21:47:58Z

2024-05-26T21:38:03Z

‎Other Material

2019-11-02T03:52:23Z

‎References

2019-11-02T03:48:57Z

‎References

2018-08-27T16:11:20Z

‎Context

2018-08-27T16:10:23Z

‎Context

2018-08-27T16:09:48Z

‎Context

2018-08-27T16:06:31Z

‎Full Title or Meme

2018-08-27T16:04:50Z

‎Context

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 <blockquote>Instead of discussing the 'probability' of a hypothesis we should try to asses what tests, what trials, it has withstood; that is, we should try to assess how far it has been able to prove its fitness to survive by standing up to tests. In brief, we should try to assess how far it has been [[Corroborated]].
 </blockquote>
-In the language of this page we speak in terms of the number and veracity of the [[Factors]] use in [[Authentication]] of the subject.
+In the language of this wiki we speak in terms of the number and veracity of the [[Authentication Factor]]s used in [[Authentication]] of the subject.
 ==Solution ==
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 [[Category:Assurance]]
 [[Category: Authentication]]
-[[Category: Factor]
+[[Category: Factor]]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 ==Problem==
 Popper nicely described the problem in this way<ref>''The Logic of Scientific Discovery English Edition'' (1959)  chapter X ISBN 0-415-07892-X</ref>
-<blockquote>Instead of discussing the 'probability' of a hypothesis we should try to asses what tests, what trials, it has withstood; that is, we should try to assess how far it has been able to prove its fitness to survive by standing up to tests. In brief, we should try to assess how fart it has been [[Corroborated]].
+<blockquote>Instead of discussing the 'probability' of a hypothesis we should try to asses what tests, what trials, it has withstood; that is, we should try to assess how far it has been able to prove its fitness to survive by standing up to tests. In brief, we should try to assess how far it has been [[Corroborated]].
 </blockquote>
 ==Solution ==

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 ==References==
 # Synonyms include: [[Assurance]] [[Attested]] [[Validated]].
 [[Category:Glossary]]
 [[Category:Assurance]]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 *A hypothesis about the [[Subject]]'s identity can start with a self-assertion from the [[Subject]]. From there incremental corroboration can be applied until the [[Subject]] has proved sufficient information to allow [[Authorization]] to proceed.
 *For example, one detail that may need corroboration is the quality of [[Attested|Attestation]] of the protection offered to [[User]] [[Credential]]s by a [[User Agent]].
-*The context of the [[Authorization]] will also be an important part of the determination sufficiency of the corroboration. For example the risk of (1) releasing information inappropriately or (2) the risk of not getting paid for access to the [[Resource]]. This evaluation is often called [[Fraud Detection]].
+*The context of the [[Authorization]] will also be an important part of the determination sufficiency of the corroboration. For example the risk (1) of releasing information inappropriately or (2) of not getting paid for access to the [[Resource]]. This evaluation is often called [[Fraud Detection]].
 ==Problem==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Full Title or Meme==
-A hypothesis is [[Corroborated]] if some series of tests can confirm the hypothesis about a [[Subject]]'s [[Identity]].
+A hypothesis is [[Corroborated]] if some series of tests can confirm the hypothesis about (for example) a [[Subject]]'s [[Identity]].
 ==Context==