Democracy - Revision history

Tom: /* The Right of the People */

2025-10-08T17:21:57Z

‎The Right of the People

Tom: /* The Right of the People */

2025-10-08T17:20:18Z

‎The Right of the People

Tom: /* Context */

2025-10-08T17:16:30Z

‎Context

Tom: /* =The Right of the People */

2025-10-08T17:15:41Z

‎=The Right of the People

Tom: /* Context */

2025-10-08T17:12:59Z

‎Context

Tom: /* Responsibility */

2025-09-08T15:18:26Z

‎Responsibility

Tom: /* Power */

2025-09-08T15:15:31Z

‎Power

Tom: /* The Common Thread */

2025-09-08T15:14:54Z

‎The Common Thread

Tom: /* Power */

2025-09-08T15:13:49Z

‎Power

Tom: /* Stability */

2025-04-15T05:47:00Z

‎Stability

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 Nwanevu turns from an exploration of democracy in the abstract to an assessment of how "our democracy" works in practice. And given all we've said and learned about democracy so far, the book leads through a set of sobering conclusions.
-First of all, America is not, in fact, a democracy. Many of its founders were afraid of democracy and fought to prevent such a mob rule.
+First of all, America is not, in fact, a [[Democracy]]. Many of its founders were afraid of democracy and fought to prevent such a mob rule.
 ==Problems==

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 It is desirable because it offers us especially useful tools for governance in our own interests. Systems are democratic to the extent that they respond to the governed, who should be equal in standing, on a majoritarian basis. Democracies cannot reflect some stable and transcendent "will of the people" or even the "will" of a single cohesive majority. Instead, they give the people they govern the right to govern themselves through fair, majoritarian contests for power. And as imperfect as we may be individually and collectively, we have good reasons to believe that democratic decision-making can work well for us. Given this, we should embrace democracy with confidence, evaluating and improving our democratic systems in keeping with certain principles advanced in the last chapter: a liberalism that secures certain basic rights; a republicanism that gives us the means to ward off domination; an agonism that recognizes the inevitability of division and conflict; and a materialism that recognizes how economic conditions-and the reality that we are both politically and economically governed - shape our democratic agency.
-Here, we turn from an exploration of democracy in the abstract to an assessment of how "our democracy" works in practice. And given all we've said and learned about democracy so far, the chapters ahead will lead us through a set of sobering conclusions.
+Nwanevu turns from an exploration of democracy in the abstract to an assessment of how "our democracy" works in practice. And given all we've said and learned about democracy so far, the book leads through a set of sobering conclusions.
-America is not, in fact, a democracy. Many of its founders were afraid of democracy and fought to prevent such a mob rule.
+First of all, America is not, in fact, a democracy. Many of its founders were afraid of democracy and fought to prevent such a mob rule.
 ==Problems==

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 * Many, including the author, predict that a [[Nodal Point]] is coming sooner or later, where any old existing [[Democracy]] will need to adapt, or die.
 ===The Right of the People===
-Democracy is a system in which the governed govern.<ref>Nwanevu, Osita, ''The Right of the People'' ISBN 9780593449929</ref>
+Democracy is a system in which the governed govern.<ref>Nwanevu, Osita, ''The Right of the People'' (2025) ISBN 9780593449929</ref>
 It is desirable because it offers us especially useful tools for governance in our own interests. Systems are democratic to the extent that they respond to the governed, who should be equal in standing, on a majoritarian basis. Democracies cannot reflect some stable and transcendent "will of the people" or even the "will" of a single cohesive majority. Instead, they give the people they govern the right to govern themselves through fair, majoritarian contests for power. And as imperfect as we may be individually and collectively, we have good reasons to believe that democratic decision-making can work well for us. Given this, we should embrace democracy with confidence, evaluating and improving our democratic systems in keeping with certain principles advanced in the last chapter: a liberalism that secures certain basic rights; a republicanism that gives us the means to ward off domination; an agonism that recognizes the inevitability of division and conflict; and a materialism that recognizes how economic conditions-and the reality that we are both politically and economically governed - shape our democratic agency.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * The context here is a political system that supports private property, and a capitalist economy based on private companies, all of which are regulated by the rule of law.
 * Many, including the author, predict that a [[Nodal Point]] is coming sooner or later, where any old existing [[Democracy]] will need to adapt, or die.
-===The Right of the People==
+===The Right of the People===
-Democracy, again, is a system in which the governed govern.<ref>''The Right of the People''</ref>
+Democracy is a system in which the governed govern.<ref>Nwanevu, Osita, ''The Right of the People'' ISBN 9780593449929</ref>
 It is desirable because it offers us especially useful tools for governance in our own interests. Systems are democratic to the extent that they respond to the governed, who should be equal in standing, on a majoritarian basis. Democracies cannot reflect some stable and transcendent "will of the people" or even the "will" of a single cohesive majority. Instead, they give the people they govern the right to govern themselves through fair, majoritarian contests for power. And as imperfect as we may be individually and collectively, we have good reasons to believe that democratic decision-making can work well for us. Given this, we should embrace democracy with confidence, evaluating and improving our democratic systems in keeping with certain principles advanced in the last chapter: a liberalism that secures certain basic rights; a republicanism that gives us the means to ward off domination; an agonism that recognizes the inevitability of division and conflict; and a materialism that recognizes how economic conditions-and the reality that we are both politically and economically governed - shape our democratic agency.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * The context here is a political system that supports private property, and a capitalist economy based on private companies, all of which are regulated by the rule of law.
 * Many, including the author, predict that a [[Nodal Point]] is coming sooner or later, where any old existing [[Democracy]] will need to adapt, or die.
 ==Problems==

@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 ===Personal===
 * What people do in private is their own business in-so-far as it breaks no laws.
-* What people to in public should be beyond reproach if they wish to be known for their probity.
+* What people do in public should be beyond reproach if they wish to be known for their probity.
 ===Corporate===
-Milton Freeman of the Chicago School famously asserted
+Milton Freeman of the Chicago School famously asserted There’s no such thing as a free lunch.
 ==Stability==

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 Nietzsche describe the primal motivation of mankind as a will to power.
-Absolutely, Tom. Let’s walk through how Charles I and Donald Trump each disrupted their respective constitutional orders—no tables, just a narrative arc that traces the stress fractures they exposed.
+Let’s walk through how Charles I and Donald Trump each disrupted their respective constitutional orders—no tables, just a narrative arc that traces the stress fractures they exposed.
 ===Charles I===

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 8 September 2025
Line 49:		Line 49:

	In essence, Charles broke the system and forced a rebuild. Trump bends the system, revealing its elasticity—and its potential to snap.		In essence, Charles broke the system and forced a rebuild. Trump bends the system, revealing its elasticity—and its potential to snap.
−
−	Would you like to layer this with a trust architecture lens next? We could explore how each figure’s legitimacy model maps to coercive vs. consent-based governance. Or perhaps trace the evolution from Hobbesian sovereignty to Madisonian checks and balances.

	==Speed==		==Speed==

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 ===Power===
 Nietzsche describe the primal motivation of mankind as a will to power.
 ==Speed==

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 This rainbow-flag polity, Plato argues, is, for many people, the fairest of regimes. The freedom in that democracy has to be experienced to be believed — with shame and privilege in particular emerging over time as anathema. But it is inherently unstable. As the authority of elites fades, as Establishment values cede to popular ones, views and identities can become so magnificently diverse as to be mutually uncomprehending. And when all the barriers to equality, formal and informal, have been removed; when everyone is equal; when elites are despised and full license is established to do “whatever one wants,” you arrive at what might be called late-stage democracy. There is no kowtowing to authority here, let alone to political experience or expertise.</blockquote>
-It is at this time that the dictator rises and promises to cut through all the crap claiming ?too much freedom seems to change into nothing but too much slavery" and offing to take on the elites and so ends democracy.
+It is at this time that the dictator rises and promises to cut through all the crap claiming "too much freedom seems to change into nothing but too much slavery" and offing to take on the elites and so ends democracy.
 ==References==