Innovation - Revision history

Tom: /* Solutions */

2026-02-23T23:48:18Z

‎Solutions

Tom: /* Context */

2024-06-02T23:29:44Z

‎Context

Tom: /* Context */

2024-06-02T23:20:33Z

‎Context

Tom: /* Full Title or Meme */

2024-06-02T23:12:40Z

‎Full Title or Meme

Tom: /* Full Title or Meme */

2024-06-02T23:04:18Z

‎Full Title or Meme

Tom: /* Full Title or Meme */

2024-06-02T22:55:48Z

‎Full Title or Meme

Tom: /* Technology */

2024-02-21T18:29:58Z

‎Technology

Tom: /* The Naming of People */

2024-02-21T18:29:27Z

‎The Naming of People

Tom: /* Technology */

2024-02-20T19:33:03Z

‎Technology

Tom: /* Full Title or Meme */

2024-02-20T19:30:41Z

‎Full Title or Meme

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:48, 23 February 2026
Line 55:		Line 55:
	Compare with other solutions like:		Compare with other solutions like:

		+	===Social Impacts===
		+	continued technological innovation and stable human societies are compatible, but only if innovation is deliberately embedded in social institutions, governance, and human capabilities—not allowed to run purely as a market or engineering race.
		+	Below is a clear framework, grounded in research and policy evidence, for how that balance can be achieved.
		+
		+	====Treat innovation as a social process, not just a technical one====
		+	Research consistently shows that innovation that improves welfare and stability is not just about new tools, but about how societies adapt their norms, institutions, and behaviors around those tools.
		+
		+	Social innovation research emphasizes participatory governance, stakeholder inclusion, and adaptability to local contexts as critical for long‑term resilience, rather than technology‑only solutions. [mdpi.com]
		+	Innovation that ignores distributional effects (who benefits, who bears costs) tends to destabilize societies even when it increases aggregate wealth. [onlinelibr....wiley.com]
		+
		+	Principle:
		+
		+	Technological change must co‑evolve with social practices and institutions.
		+
		+	====Slow the social pace of change, not the technical pace====
		+	A key mistake is assuming societies must move as fast as technologies do. Evidence suggests stability improves when institutions absorb shocks gradually, even while innovation continues rapidly.
		+
		+	OECD analysis shows that policy stability and institutional quality are essential for translating innovation into sustainable growth rather than disruption. [oecd.org]
		+	Studies of digital infrastructure show that rapid digital deployment without social infrastructure (education, trust, community institutions) reinforces inequality and fragmentation. [link.springer.com]
		+
		+	Translation:
		+	We don’t need to slow invention—we need buffers: education systems, labor transitions, and governance mechanisms that convert novelty into continuity.
		+
		+	====Build governance for foresight, not just regulation====
		+	Traditional regulation reacts after harm occurs. Stable innovation ecosystems instead use anticipatory governance—testing, foresight, and adaptive policy.
		+
		+	UN and OECD frameworks emphasize technology foresight, scenario planning, and adaptive regulation to manage uncertainty while preserving innovation capacity. [social.desa.un.org], [oecd.org]
		+	Innovation governance research highlights transparency, accountability, and equity as prerequisites for public trust—especially for AI and digital systems. [onlinelibr....wiley.com]
		+
		+	Key idea:
		+
		+	Stability comes from legitimacy and trust, not control alone.
		+
		+	====Preserve social cohesion by designing technology for prosocial outcomes====
		+	Technology can either amplify division or strengthen trust—design choices matter.
		+
		+	Research on social cohesion shows digital systems often magnify existing inequalities unless access, skills, and agency are explicitly addressed. [belfercenter.org]
		+	Policy and civil‑society initiatives now focus on prosocial design—technology that supports cooperation, deliberation, and shared problem‑solving rather than outrage and extraction. [techandsoc...hesion.org], [toda.org]
		+
		+	Implication:
		+	Markets alone will not optimize for cohesion; values must be encoded into design and incentives.
		+	====Redefine “progress” beyond GDP and speed====
		+	One reason innovation destabilizes societies is that success is measured too narrowly.
		+
		+	Innovation scholarship increasingly argues for broader welfare metrics: mental health, dignity, capability, environmental sustainability, and equity—not just productivity. [onlinelibr....wiley.com]
		+	Sustainable innovation policy aligns technological missions (climate, health, inclusion) with explicit social goals, rather than assuming benefits will trickle down. [academic.oup.com]
		+
		+	Bottom line:
		+
		+	Societies remain stable when people experience progress as improvement in life, not just acceleration of systems.
		+	====Anchor innovation in institutional resilience====
		+	Crises reveal whether innovation strengthens or weakens societies.
		+	Studies of COVID‑19 show that societies with strong social innovation ecosystems—linking government, academia, civil society, and technology—adapted more successfully under stress. [mdpi.com]
		+	Stability comes from institutional redundancy and cooperation, not from fragile optimization.
		+
		+	A simple synthesis model = think of the balance like this:
		+	Fast technology + slow institutions → chaos
		+	Slow technology + slow institutions → stagnation
		+	Fast technology + adaptive institutions → stable progress
		+
		+	Adaptive institutions include:
		+	Education and reskilling systems
		+	Transparent governance
		+	Inclusive economic transitions
		+	Social safety nets
		+	Civic trust mechanisms
		+
		+
		+	====Final takeaway====
		+	We can have continued technological innovation and stable human societies if innovation is treated as a public capability—not a runaway force.
		+	Stability does not come from resisting change, but from shaping how change lands in human lives.

	==Reference==		==Reference==

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *The Roman use of family name (Gens) died out with the Roman empire, but really only ever applied to the landed aristocracy where it continue in use.
 *In Britain last names became popular as people lost their binding to the land. Henry VIII ordered that legal events be recorded to make tax collection easier, which led to the addition of surnames (see section below).
-In other words, necessity (to raise money, workers or armies) is the mother of ;;Innovation]] in identity, as in much else that we use today.
+In other words, necessity (to raise money, workers or armies) is the mother of [[Innovation]] in identity, as in much else that we use today.
 ==Examples in Identity==

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *[[Identifier]]s have been discussed at least since the time that Adam was given the authority to name the animals of the world. (Genesis 2:19)
 *Chinese have been using family names since around 2,800 BC. Supposedly this was decreed by Emperor Fushi for all, not just the rich.
-*Cesar determined that all the world should be taxed. He had them go to their ancestral home to be enumerated. (Luke 2:1)
+*Caesar determined that all the world should be taxed. He had them go to their ancestral home to be enumerated. (Luke 2:1)
 *William the conqueror determined that all of the British Isles should be taxed. He created the doomsday book.
-*The Roman use of family name (Gens) died out with the Roman empire, but really only ever applied to the landed aristocracy.
+*The Roman use of family name (Gens) died out with the Roman empire, but really only ever applied to the landed aristocracy where it continue in use.
 *In Britain last names became popular as people lost their binding to the land. Henry VIII ordered that legal events be recorded to make tax collection easier, which led to the addition of surnames (see section below).
-In other words, necessity (to raise money, workers or armies) is the mother of innovation in identity, as in much else that we use today.
+In other words, necessity (to raise money, workers or armies) is the mother of ;;Innovation]] in identity, as in much else that we use today.
 ==Examples in Identity==

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Whenever a system of any sort gets stuck in a rut, it is either because the system is already well-adapted to the current environment, or because all of the methods of solving a problem have been tried, but nothing works better than what is already known and in use. In the term of the book, "What Got you Here Wont get you There".<ref>Marshall Goldsmith, ''What Got you Here Wont get you There'' (2007-01-09) ISBN 978-1401301309</ref>
-This page is focused on the user of [[Identifier]]s used in data processing. It is worth noting that knowing the name of something will tell you nothing about the thing named. For privacy reason that is a very good thing indeed, but in most cases we also know to know at least some of the [[Attribute]]s or [[Behavior]]s of that named object in order to make any use of it whatsoever.
+This page is primarily focused on [[Identifier]]s used in data processing. It is worth noting that knowing the name of something typically will tell you nothing about the thing named. For privacy reason that is a very good thing indeed, but in most cases we also know to know at least some of the [[Attribute]]s or [[Behavior]]s of that named object in order to make any use of it whatsoever.
 ==Context==

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 The application of new ideas that cause disruption of existing patterns and traditions and how those disruptions impact [[Identifier]]s. [[Innovation]]s are also required to accommodate [[Ecosystem]] changes as they occur.
-Whenever a system of any sort gets stuck in a rut, it is either because the system will well-adapted to the current environment, or because all of the methods of solving a problem have been tried, but nothing works better than what is already known and in use. In the term of the book, "What Got you Here Wont get you There".<rev>Marshall Goldsmith, ''What Got you Here Wont get you There'' (2007-01-09) ISBN 978-1401301309</ref>
+Whenever a system of any sort gets stuck in a rut, it is either because the system is already well-adapted to the current environment, or because all of the methods of solving a problem have been tried, but nothing works better than what is already known and in use. In the term of the book, "What Got you Here Wont get you There".<ref>Marshall Goldsmith, ''What Got you Here Wont get you There'' (2007-01-09) ISBN 978-1401301309</ref>
 ==Context==

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 # Prior to the Warring States period (around the fifth century BC), only ruling families and the aristocratic elite possessed surnames.
 # These surnames are exclusively patronyms. Women typically do not change their surnames upon marriage, except in places with more Western influences. Meanwhile western countries are either combining patronyms and matronyms or following the Chinese tradition of allowing women to keep their surname after marriage.
-===Technology===
+====Technology====
 Unfortunately technology is created mostly in European-originated countries so we have absurdities like the following which mixes the idea of Surname (a logical type) with Firstname (a position type). Clearly this is an absurdity brought about by chauvinistic attitudes of developers.<ref>W3C, ''Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0'' https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0/#names-and-descriptions</ref>
      "familyName": "Castafiori",

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 In other words, necessity (to raise money, workers or armies) is the mother of innovation in identity, as in much else that we use today.
-==The Naming of People==
+==Examples in Identity==
 Innovation is impacting Identifiers applied to people. In Roman times, the family name (gens) was important, in Ancient Israel it was the tribal association. In western land the patronym became common. In Spain the matronym is added after the patronym. The Picts of Scotland used just the matronym. Confusion was created when the location of these surnames turned out to be very different in different parts of the world. In 2024 we are still trying to reconcile these traditions with technology.
 # Dissolution of Monasteries: Henry VIII dissolved numerous monasteries and convents as part of the English Reformation. These religious institutions had often been centers of education, record-keeping, and administration. With their dissolution, many records were lost, including those containing information about lineage and family names.

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_passport https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_passports]  have varying name fields based on the available space in the electronic readable part. It is known as Surname followed by Given Names (abbreviated if necessary). It is not clear if either the surname or the given names are actually lists (or includes spaces).
 * It can be instructive to look at a passport from Spain to see how they accommodate matronyms.
-** The name Jose Antonio Johan Palme Sierra - their preferred name is Johan and the last name in the US is the patronym Palme
+** The name Jose Antonio Johan Palme Sierra - their preferred name is Johan and the last name in the US is the patronym Palme.
-** On the passport the name is  Palme space Sierra doubleapace Jose space Antonio space Johan
+** On the passport the name is  "Palme" space "Sierra" doubleapace "Jose" space "Antonio" space "Johan".
-** In other words, a surname (that might contain spaces), a double space and a (that might contain spaces) given name .
+** In other words, a surname (that might contain spaces), a double space and a given name (that might contain spaces).
 * Legal name may not match the name given in a digital transactions. Context is important.