Tom: /* References */

2022-07-03T19:47:41Z

‎References

Tom: Created page with "==Full Title or Meme== ==Context== * Kim Cameron articulated early that "The internet was built without an identity layer", by which he meant an organic life form identity l..."

2022-07-03T19:46:49Z

Created page with "==Full Title or Meme== ==Context== * Kim Cameron articulated early that "The internet was built without an identity layer", by which he meant an organic life form identity l..."

New page

==Full Title or Meme==

==Context==

* Kim Cameron articulated early that "The internet was built without an identity layer", by which he meant an organic life form identity layer.
*Clearly the DNS is a silicon life form identity layer where each silicon life form gets an IP address.
*OIX & OpenID foundation want to address this with Identity first.
*The problem is that (most Western) humans do not want to be objectified. (I admit I never understood Confucius.)
*So, identifiers and attributes (nouns and adjectives) are antithetical to privacy.
*Does privacy impact OpenID foundation? - yes it does! T-Cell designed to destroy the virus created by OIX & OpenID.
*Somehow ecosystems have evolved to accommodate both. So we know that it can be done.
*I was musing about the self-sovereign community and how they chose to accommodate privacy and identity.
*So the DID core spec has evolved to have no concept of the distinction between organic and silicon life forms. In other words, it is amoral.
*What they have created to enable the distinction is the type in the VC and [[Governance Framework]]s to regulate ecosystems.
*Or in other words, they have recreated federations (or governments) using other words to make it sound like something new and different.
*The [[Governance Framework]]s are [[Ethics|Ethical frameworks]], or morals. (I do understand Aristotle.)
*FAPI exists within a [[Governance Framework]] which eventually goes back to a financial framework which is backed by laws which are backed by morals.
*The same can be said to apply to the mobile phone work group in OIDF or any other specific application area.
*The AB/C work group seems to have chosen to avoid consideration of [[Governance Framework]]s. (and that has worked up until now.)
*So the question for OIDF AB/C is whether to address the [[Governance Framework]] for OIDC (or its successor spec)?
*For identifiers to work with privacy, IMHO such a common [[Governance Framework]] is required.
*Perhaps that is how to deal with the disruption that the browser guys are creating.
*As of right now there is not a common framework between the privacy-first and the identity-first advocates.
*As a result, it is hard for OIDF to formulate a strong case to present to the browser guys.
*At a minimum I propose that we need a framework that deals with both identity and privacy as equals.
*Or we can just let them continue on their path and try to accommodate to their framework.

==References==

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 3 July 2022
Line 27:		Line 27:

	==References==		==References==
		+
		+	[[Category: Identifier]]
		+	[[Category: Federation]]

OIDC User Experience - Revision history

Tom: /* References */

Tom: Created page with "==Full Title or Meme== ==Context== * Kim Cameron articulated early that "The internet was built without an identity layer", by which he meant an organic life form identity l..."