Personal Information Economics - Revision history

Tom: /* Context */

2021-02-21T20:08:24Z

‎Context

Tom: /* Opposing arguements */

2021-02-21T20:06:56Z

‎Opposing arguements

Tom: /* Opposing arguements */

2021-02-21T20:05:26Z

‎Opposing arguements

Tom: /* PI must not be labled as an econmic good */

2021-02-21T20:02:15Z

‎PI must not be labled as an econmic good

Tom: /* Opposing arguements */

2021-02-21T20:01:52Z

‎Opposing arguements

Tom: /* Opposing arguements */

2021-02-21T19:59:41Z

‎Opposing arguements

Tom: /* Opposing arguements */

2021-02-21T19:57:12Z

‎Opposing arguements

Tom: /* Opposing arguements */

2021-02-21T19:50:50Z

‎Opposing arguements

Tom: /* PI is an economic good */

2021-02-21T19:48:28Z

‎PI is an economic good

Tom: /* Full Title or Meme */

2021-02-21T19:47:46Z

‎Full Title or Meme

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ==Context==
 * From the economic meaning of the term '''good''' as something of value comes the question whether all of life's pleasures should be valued in economic terms.
 ==Opposing arguements==

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ===PI must not be labled as an econmic good===
-In a Q&A session with Harvards's Elizabeth Renieris the question of data as an economic good was roundly disputed. If we focus on privacy as the firth to be let alone, then selling my data could impact others rights to control who can impinge on their attention.<ref>Jeff Benson, ''Data Ownership Is Dangerous'' https://digitalprivacy.news/2020/03/30/harvards-elizabeth-renieris-data-ownership-is-dangerous/</ref><blockquote> ...blockchain-obsessed idealists, want to forge a future in which people can profit from their data. Elizabeth Renieris thinks that’s a dangerous idea. ...this idea of a transaction that actually extinguishes your rights in relation to that data is really dangerous, because you cannot imagine all the ways that could go wrong.  ...If I sell “my” contact list to Facebook, the people in that list have no opportunity to consent to that. They don’t have any say in the matter.</blockquote>
+In a Q&A session with Harvards's Elizabeth Renieris the question of data as an economic good was roundly disputed. If we focus on [[Privacy]] as the right to be let alone, then selling my data could impact others rights to control who can impinge on their attention.<ref>Jeff Benson, ''Data Ownership Is Dangerous'' https://digitalprivacy.news/2020/03/30/harvards-elizabeth-renieris-data-ownership-is-dangerous/</ref><blockquote> ...blockchain-obsessed idealists, want to forge a future in which people can profit from their data. Elizabeth Renieris thinks that’s a dangerous idea. ...this idea of a transaction that actually extinguishes your rights in relation to that data is really dangerous, because you cannot imagine all the ways that could go wrong.  ...If I sell “my” contact list to Facebook, the people in that list have no opportunity to consent to that. They don’t have any say in the matter.</blockquote>
 ==References==
 [[Category:Privacy]]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ===PI must not be labled as an econmic good===
-In a Q&A session with Harvards's Elizabeth Renieris the question of data as on economic good was roundly disputed.<ref>Jeff Benson, ''Data Ownership Is Dangerous'' https://digitalprivacy.news/2020/03/30/harvards-elizabeth-renieris-data-ownership-is-dangerous/</ref><blockquote> ...blockchain-obsessed idealists, want to forge a future in which people can profit from their data. Elizabeth Renieris thinks that’s a dangerous idea. ...this idea of a transaction that actually extinguishes your rights in relation to that data is really dangerous, because you cannot imagine all the ways that could go wrong.</blockquote>
+In a Q&A session with Harvards's Elizabeth Renieris the question of data as an economic good was roundly disputed. If we focus on privacy as the firth to be let alone, then selling my data could impact others rights to control who can impinge on their attention.<ref>Jeff Benson, ''Data Ownership Is Dangerous'' https://digitalprivacy.news/2020/03/30/harvards-elizabeth-renieris-data-ownership-is-dangerous/</ref><blockquote> ...blockchain-obsessed idealists, want to forge a future in which people can profit from their data. Elizabeth Renieris thinks that’s a dangerous idea. ...this idea of a transaction that actually extinguishes your rights in relation to that data is really dangerous, because you cannot imagine all the ways that could go wrong.  ...If I sell “my” contact list to Facebook, the people in that list have no opportunity to consent to that. They don’t have any say in the matter.</blockquote>
 ==References==
 [[Category:Privacy]]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ===PI must not be labled as an econmic good===
-In a Q&A session with Harvards's Elizabeth Renieris the question of data as on economic good was roundly disputed.
+In a Q&A session with Harvards's Elizabeth Renieris the question of data as on economic good was roundly disputed.<ref>Jeff Benson, ''Data Ownership Is Dangerous'' https://digitalprivacy.news/2020/03/30/harvards-elizabeth-renieris-data-ownership-is-dangerous/</ref><blockquote> ...blockchain-obsessed idealists, want to forge a future in which people can profit from their data. Elizabeth Renieris thinks that’s a dangerous idea. ...this idea of a transaction that actually extinguishes your rights in relation to that data is really dangerous, because you cannot imagine all the ways that could go wrong.</blockquote>
 ==References==
 [[Category:Privacy]]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ===PI must not be labled as an econmic good===
-In a Q&A session with Harvards's Elizabeth Renieris the question of
+In a Q&A session with Harvards's Elizabeth Renieris the question of data as on economic good was roundly disputed.
-<ref>Jeff Benson, ''Data Ownership Is Dangerous'' https://digitalprivacy.news/2020/03/30/harvards-elizabeth-renieris-data-ownership-is-dangerous/</ref><blockchain> ...blockchain-obsessed idealists, want to forge a future in which people can profit from their data. Elizabeth Renieris thinks that’s a dangerous idea. </blockquote>
+<ref>Jeff Benson, ''Data Ownership Is Dangerous'' https://digitalprivacy.news/2020/03/30/harvards-elizabeth-renieris-data-ownership-is-dangerous/</ref><blockquote> ...blockchain-obsessed idealists, want to forge a future in which people can profit from their data. Elizabeth Renieris thinks that’s a dangerous idea. ...this idea of a transaction that actually extinguishes your rights in relation to that data is really dangerous, because you cannot imagine all the ways that could go wrong.</blockquote>
 ==References==
 [[Category:Privacy]]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ==Opposing arguements==
 ===PI is an economic good===
-*A New York Times '''Economic View''' opined that data has "value as an eonomic resource".<ref>David Deming, ''A Need to balance Privacy with Data Sharing''. New York Times p. B5 </ref> It is not clear why data about private people should ever become the economic property of a company, but that appears to be a common phenomonon. <blockquote>Data increasingly prowers innovation and it needs to be used for the public good. ... Data provides a record of what has already happened, but its main value come from improving preditions. ... The buzzy refrain of th digital age is that "data is the new oil". ... When Celera mapped a gene first, it protected its(sic) intellectual property by requiring other firms to negotiate licensing agreements or pay high fees before using the dta. Yeras later the genes mapped by Celera led to many fewer innovations and commercial products than those that were immediately put in the public domain.</blockquote>
+*A New York Times '''Economic View''' opined that data has "value as an eonomic resource".<ref>David Deming, ''A Need to balance Privacy with Data Sharing''. New York Times p. B5 </ref> It is not clear why data about private people should ever become the economic property of a company, but that appears to be a common phenomonon. <blockquote>Data increasingly prowers innovation and it needs to be used for the public good. ... Data provides a record of what has already happened, but its main value comes from improving predictions. ... The buzzy refrain of the digital age is that "data is the new oil". ... When Celera mapped a gene first, it protected its(sic) intellectual property by requiring other firms to negotiate licensing agreements or pay high fees before using the dta. Yeras later the genes mapped by Celera led to many fewer innovations and commercial products than those that were immediately put in the public domain. ... Data's increasing value as an economic resource requires a new way of thinking.</blockquote>
 ===PI must not be labled as an econmic good===

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Full Title or Meme==
-The idea that our Personal Information is an '''economic good''' has gained attention. Is that a good thing?
+The idea that our Personal Information (PI) is an '''economic good''' has gained attention. Is that a good thing?
 ==Context==