Right to be Forgotten - Revision history

Tom: /* References */

2025-08-14T05:26:28Z

‎References

2025-05-05T19:13:37Z

‎Insanity

2025-05-05T19:10:43Z

‎Danger to Privacy

2025-05-05T19:07:15Z

‎Historical Record

2025-01-12T23:36:44Z

‎Danger to Privacy

2025-01-12T23:29:45Z

‎Full Title or Meme

2025-01-12T23:26:56Z

‎Full Title or Meme

2025-01-12T23:23:29Z

‎Full Title or Meme

2025-01-12T23:11:43Z

‎Historical Record

2025-01-12T23:08:30Z

‎Problems

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 ===Insanity===
-Humans generally appear to be social animals that only do well in groups. Cases of enforced isolation have been shown to induce insanity.
+* Some conditions, like convictions of a crime or confinement to a mental hospital, cause the loss of some rights or privileges. Taken literally this is not  in conformance with the [[Right to be Forgotten]].
 ==Solutions==

@@ Line 51: / Line 51: @@
 ===Danger to Privacy===
-In order for the search engines to avoid reporting facts that have been declared "forgotten", they have accumulated a vast trove of very damaging data about the people that want it to be forgotten. Given the breaches against supposedly secure data bases on the web, it is almost certain that these store of damaging factions will be breached at some point.
+In order for the search engines to avoid reporting facts that have been declared "forgotten", they have accumulated a vast trove of very damaging data about the people that want it to be forgotten. Given the breaches against supposedly secure data bases on the web, it is almost certain that these store of damaging factions will be breached at some point.<ref>Jorge Palomares ''Immutable Yet Compliant: Harmonizing Blockchain with GDPR'' https://emildai.eu/immutable-yet-compliant-harmonizing-blockchain-with-gdpr/</ref>
 ===Insanity===
 Humans generally appear to be social animals that only do well in groups. Cases of enforced isolation have been shown to induce insanity.

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 ===Historical Record===
-It could lead to the erasure of important historical records, impacting the collective memory and understanding of past events.
+It could lead to the erasure of important historical records, impacting the collective memory and understanding of past events. Perhaps this right will lead to absurd conclusions like the impossibility of biographies of living people, or the prohibition of cryptographic blockchains.
 ===Danger to Privacy===
 In order for the search engines to avoid reporting facts that have been declared "forgotten", they have accumulated a vast trove of very damaging data about the people that want it to be forgotten. Given the breaches against supposedly secure data bases on the web, it is almost certain that these store of damaging factions will be breached at some point.

@@ Line 51: / Line 51: @@
 ===Danger to Privacy===
 In order for the search engines to avoid reporting facts that have been declared "forgotten", they have accumulated a vast trove of very damaging data about the people that want it to be forgotten. Given the breaches against supposedly secure data bases on the web, it is almost certain that these store of damaging factions will be breached at some point.
 ==Solutions==

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 An attempt by cluelessly incompetent functionaries to allow an individual to censor specific [[User Public Information]], in effect to retroactively turn [[User Public Information]] into [[User Private Information]].
 Also known as The Right to Oblivion<ref>Lowry Pressly, ''The Right to Oblivion: Privacy and the Good Life'' 2024 Harvard UP  ISBN 9780674260528</ref> in a world where imaging seems to exist on every street corner. Does the Right to Life and Liberty extend to The Right to be Let Alone?
 ==Context==

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 12 January 2025
Line 38:		Line 38:

	And more articles come every day. It will be a long time before the world re-establishes some sort or normalcy about [[User Public Information]] after that bad decision in Spain.		And more articles come every day. It will be a long time before the world re-establishes some sort or normalcy about [[User Public Information]] after that bad decision in Spain.
		+	===Freedom of Expression===
		+	Critics argue that it can infringe on the right to freedom of expression and access to information.
		+
		+	===Censorship Concerns===
		+	There is a risk of misuse, where individuals or entities might attempt to erase legitimate information to avoid accountability.
		+
		+	===Historical Record===
		+	It could lead to the erasure of important historical records, impacting the collective memory and understanding of past events.

	==Solutions==		==Solutions==