Difference between revisions of "Blockchain"

From MgmtWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Context)
(→‎Use Cases)
 
(129 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Full Title or Meme==
 
==Full Title or Meme==
−
[[Block Chain]] will solve all problems, provided you have the energy of a small sun available to power it.
+
[[Blockchain]] will solve all [[Identifier]] [[Trust]] problems, provided you have infallible programmers and the energy of a small sun available to power it.
 +
 
 
==Context==
 
==Context==
−
The technology for [[Block Chain]] itself has been around for at least 20 years. It was even commercialized by Bellcore
+
The technology for [[Block Chain]] itself has been around since the beginning of the century. These simple chains allowed non-revocable commitments by creating a series of blocks that included a collection of all of the block hashes received since the last update plus the hash of that last update. The has of the current block update is calculated and published in a public place plus being added to the next update in sequence. Thus each entry onto the block chain cannot be changed as so is known as one of many [[Immutable Logs]]. This feature is required to block repudiation of an action. For example if the block records the transfer of coins from one entity to another, the chain will prevent the original owner of the coin from transferring that same coin later to another entity. Thus the problem of double spending of the same coin is blocked.
 +
 
 +
That’s all in theory, of course. As John Kenneth Galbraith put it, “A constant in the history of money is that every remedy is reliably a new source of abuse.”
 +
 
 +
One comprehensive early report on the use of [[Blockchain]] and [[Distributed Ledger Technology]] in [[Identity and Access Management]] was published from a Kantara discussion group.<ref>Thomas Hardjono and Eve Maler, ''Report from the Blockchain and Smart Contracts Discussion Group to the Kantara Initiative.'' (2017-06-05) Kantara https://kantarainitiative.org/download/6828</ref>
 +
 
 +
It is not at all clear where the single word term "Blockchain" was initiated. The first use found in the [[Bitcoin]] archives of the two word [[Block Chain]] was [http://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/6/ a conversation between Hal Finney & Satoshi] on 2008-11-09 where Hal writes:
 +
it is mentioned that if a broadcast transaction does not reach all nodes, it is OK, as it will get into the block chain before long.
 +
 
 +
[https://billatnapier.medium.com/a-bluffers-guide-to-blockchain-100-knowledge-snippets-77d83d54e107 A good summary of the steps leading to the current use of blockchains.]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===Simple Chains===
 +
Block chains were first commercialized by Bellcore which published the hash of each day's update in the New York Times.<ref>BELLCORE SPINS OFF NEW COMPANY TO OFFER DIGITAL NOTARY (TM)(SM) SERVICE  http://seclists.org/interesting-people/1994/Mar/100</ref> (This appears to be the first public ledger. Although township records could be considered as holding that honor.) An academic paper was published by Haber and Stornetta in 1991. <ref>Stuart Haber +1, ''How To Time-Stamp a Digital Document'' Journal of Cryptography (1991 data rec'd 1990-08-19) https://www.math.columbia.edu/~bayer/papers/Timestamp_BHS93.pdf</ref> [http://www.surety.com/ Surety. LLC] is a continuation of that service that was still available in 2018. In this instantiation, block chain got its [[Non-Repudiation]] from the immutability of the hash published in the New York Times which became publicly available the very next day in nearly every library in the United States. This method was based on a centralized steward as are most current [[Decentralized ID]] methods. The Bellcore implemented solution was an immutable chain of blocks, but did not call itself a block chain.
 +
 
 +
===Proof of Work===
 +
The point of proof of work is to randomize the choice for the source node for the next block in the chain. This will allow trust to be established for the case where less that 50% of the node are colluding to subvert the chain. Thus is created the trust, or non-repudiation of contents of the block chain.
 +
*The first successful block chain with distributed ledger was created by the pseudonymous S. Nakamoto<ref>S. Nakamoto. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash. The proponents of bitcoin had a radical agenda, which was to disintermediate incumbents and remove those entities that have responsibility for creating trust, such as financial services firms and central banks.
 +
system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, 2008.</ref> which resulted in the highly popular [[Anonymous]] money known as Bitcoin.
 +
*Mark Russinovich did an interesting calculation that showed that this pow scheme was, in May of 2018, consuming as much power as the entire country of Denmark.<ref>Mark Russinovich Microsoft Build (2018-05-06) https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/2018/BRK2507</ref>
 +
*Other estimates put the energy requirements at the level of all electricity generated today will be needed for bitcoin in  a few years.<ref>Adam Rodgers, ''The Hard Math Behind Bitcoin's Global Warming Problem.'' (2017-12-17) Wired https://www.wired.com/story/bitcoin-global-warming/</ref>
 +
* [https://futurism.com/bitcoin-mining-company-buys-entire-coal-power-plant Bitcoin Mining Company Buys Entire Coal Power Plant] The company is burning through 600,000 tons of coal per year. 2021-09-27
 +
 
 +
===Proof of Stake===
 +
In the attempt to overcome the cost of the "Proof of Work" source of trust, new methods are proposed to select the source of the next approved block of the chain. Some sort of randomization is required to ensure that a minority of the participant cannot overcome the trust, or non-reputability of the chain.
  
 
==Problems==
 
==Problems==
 +
* The current problem that many architects are trying to solve with block chaining relate to the concentration of user information in a small number of very large companies.
 +
* There are some [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof-of-stake efforts to reduce the power consumption]. If those work, it looks like the solution will just be some other trust framework, but with a different name. For example the proposal of Hardjono et al.<ref>Thos Hardjono, +2 ''Towards a Design Philosophy for Inter-operable Blockchain Systems
 +
'' MIT May 16, 2018 [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.05934.pdf]</ref> goes to a [[Resilience|Resilient]] system like the internet, which is, of necessity, single rooted even though nearly all components can work independently for a time, just as the internet itself functions today.
 +
* There has been no significant uptake of block chaining with distributed ledger in real world businesses other than money laundering.<ref>Andrew Orlowski, ''Blockchain study finds 0.00% success rate and vendors don't call back when asked for evidence.'' (2018-11-30) The Register  https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/11/30/blockchain_study_finds_0_per_cent_success_rate/</ref><ref>Nathaniel Popper, ''Bitcoin Has Lost Steam. But Criminals Still Love It.'' (2020-01-28) New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/technology/bitcoin-black-market.html?auth=login-email&login=email</ref>
 +
* The Risks of Cryptocurrencies<ref>Peter B Neumann, ''The Risks of Cryptocurrencies'' (2018-06) '''CACM Vol 61''' No. 6 p. 20ff </ref> have been well documented at least since Peter Neumann listed some of them in June 2018. But the hope and hype continue to inflate their value, albeit with wild swings in value. Neumann's conclusion was to quote "the philosopher WOPR in the movie WarGames, 'The only winning move is not to play.'"
 +
* Consider the once-soaring value of Bitcoin: the ideological enclave of cryptocurrency evangelists. In Forbes, Jason Bloomberg wrote that “most of the noise around both blockchain and crypto is little more than the community talking to itself - a massive ‘echo chamber.’ ” We like to imagine ourselves as cannily seeing through such echo chambers - the self-reinforcing intellectual snow globes of people who get all their information from one another, who imagine that all the world works like their particular corner of it.<ref>Sasha Chapin, ''Small Worlds'' (2018-12-16) New York Times Magazine p. 13-15</ref> A similar "echo chamber" is building the case for [[Decentralized ID]]s where dissident options are shouted down. Only the communicant members of their religion have a voice. This was made clear on 2019-02-10 when the W3C called their uses cases "out of touch with reality".
 +
*[https://www.wired.com/story/whats-blockchain-good-for-not-much/?bxid=5c5b250d24c17c67f8640083 What's Blockchain Actually Good for, Anyway?] For Now, Not Much. Not long ago, blockchain technology was touted as a way to track tuna, bypass banks, and preserve [[Property]] records. Reality has proved a much tougher challenge.
 +
*[https://hackylawyer.com/f/forget-erasure-why-blockchain-is-really-incompatible-with-gdpr Forget erasure: why blockchain is really incompatible with GDPR] by Elizabeth M. Renieris (2019-09-24)
 +
* All data on a [[Blockchain]] is public. Some solutions that try to minimize the data on the [[Blockchain]] are described below, but none of them addresses the problem of linkage. While technically a real-world user could have as many [[Pseudonym]]s as desired, it is not practical for a variety of reasons to expect that normal users could handle more than a few. Such as one for social, one for business, one for medical data, and so on. With each of these [[Pseudonym]]s the use from one [[Web site]] to another can be mapped and these maps can be matched to real-world users.
 +
===Anarchy===
 +
Perhaps the biggest threat from blockchains is that it will succeed at removing all societal functions from control by government. If [[Blockchain]] meets its own goals, there will be no limits on what people can do, and so no limit to their excesses. Society will just collapse. Some attempt so limit the damage of blockchain follow.
 +
* US [https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0364 Treasury Takes Robust Actions to Counter Ransomware] 2021-09-21 Targets First Virtual Currency Exchange for Laundering Cyber Ransoms.
  
−
There are some [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof-of-stake efforts to reduce the power consumption]. If those work, it looks like the solution will just be some other trust framework, but with a different name. For example the proposal of Hardjono et al.<ref>Thos Hardjono, +2 ''Towards a Design Philosophy for Inter-operable Blockchain Systems
+
===The Crypto Trap===
−
'' MIT May 16, 2018 [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.05934.pdf]</ref> goes to a resilient system like the internet, which is, of necessity, single rooted even though nearly all components can work independantly for a time, just as the internet itself functions today.
+
Very early messages from Satoshi claimed that "participants can be anonymous". This his been an article of faith with the cypto currency and [[Identifier]] developers. It turns out to be false.<ref>Andy Greenberg, ''The Crypto Trap''. '''Wired 30''' No 6. (2022-06) pp.61ff.</ref> Even Bitcoin payment [or any DLT transaction] is captured in its blockchain, a permanent, unchangeable, and entirely ''public'' record of every transaction in the Bitcoin network. It protects the ledger by making everyone in the Bitcoin economy a witness to every transaction. Every criminal payment, in some sense, is a smoking gun in broad daylight.
  
 
==Solutions==
 
==Solutions==
−
*ALGORAND the block chain for business https://medium.com/algorand
+
Most of the solutions rely either on permissions for participants in the block chain process, which implies some source of trust to select the participants, or some less costly source of randomness in selecting the next node to "win" in the contest to submit the next block.<ref>Zubin Koticha, ''Proof of Stake and the History of Distributed Consensus: Part 1, Nakamoto Consensus, Byzantine Fault Tolerance, Hybrid Consensus, Thunderella.'' (2018-09-04) Thunder https://medium.com/thunderofficial/proof-of-stake-and-the-history-of-distributed-consensus-part-1-nakamoto-consensus-byzantine-176e0156316e</ref> Most of these solutions derive from the Byzantine Generals' Problem which is a cryptographic solution to making decisions when there is a lack of trust among the deciders.<ref>Lamport, L.; Shostak, R.; Pease, M., ''The Byzantine Generals Problem.'' (1982) ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems. 4 (3): 387-389. doi:10.1145/357172.357176</ref>
 +
*[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3183935 Proof-of-Stake] solutions use a random selection process, but maintain the value on the chain as the incentive for the selected updater to continue the chain.
 +
*[https://medium.com/algorand/secure-blockchain-decentralization-via-committees-7602f598a0a9 Pure Proof-of-Stake block chain systems.] Also has some good comparisons against other schemes.
 +
*[https://medium.com/algorand ALGORAND the block chain for business] contains a good collection of block chain papers.
 +
 
 +
===Side Chains===
 +
* A variety of additions to the [[Block Chain]] repertoire include a variety of simple chains (see above) rooted every so often in a "Proof-of-xxx" scheme have been proposed.
 +
* [https://identity.foundation/ The Sidetree Protocol: Scalable DPKI for Decentralized Identity] on the DIF web site.
 +
* Microsoft Launches Decentralized Identity Tool on Bitcoin Blockchain<ref>
 +
Leigh Cue, ''Microsoft Launches Decentralized Identity Tool on Bitcoin Blockchain'' (2019-05-13) Coindesk https://www.coindesk.com/microsoft-launches-decentralized-identity-tool-on-bitcoin-blockchain</ref> which gets better performance at less cost with a technique which is derived from sidechains<ref>Daniel Buchner, ''Toward scalable decentralized identifier systems .'' Microsoft Blog (2019-05-13) https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Azure-Active-Directory-Identity/Toward-scalable-decentralized-identifier-systems/ba-p/560168</ref>. A test registration is available at [https://didproject.azurewebsites.net/docs/registration.html this site.]
 +
 
 +
===Alogrand===
 +
One of the earlier solutions was [https://news.mit.edu/2021/unlocking-potential-blockchain-0616 Alogrand] developed at MIT.
 +
 
 +
===Simplest Solutions===
 +
The [[InterPlanetary File System]] IPFS can be sufficiently secure block chain for some purposes like [[Self-Sovereign Identity]] where the [[Did:orb]] method is constructed entirely using IPFS and [[Certificate Transparency]].
 +
 
 +
===LAMINA1===
 +
LAMINA1 is a new Layer-1 chain purpose built for the Open Metaverse.] The brainchild of Neal Stephenson (Chairman), who first [https://www.lamina1.com/ the Metaverse in his 1992 million-selling book Snow Crash, and Peter Vessenes (CEO), a foundational leader from the early days of Bitcoin, Lamina1 is a Layer-1 blockchain purpose-built to empower the Open Metaverse. Lamina1’s chain technology, cryptographic model and extensive intellectual property partnerships (to be announced throughout 2022) will establish it as the preferred destination for this generation’s most creative minds — those who are crafting the digital societies of the future. It is the first provably carbon-negative blockchain in the world.
 +
 
 +
===Blockchain Consensus===
 +
We have describe two of the ways at achieving consensus: proof-of-work and proof-of-stake, but these are not the only ways to achieve that. Several interesting alternate are described by Gramoli and Tang<ref>Vincent Gramoli and Qiang Tang, ''The Future of Blockchain Consensus'' '''CACM 66''' No. 7 (2023-07) p 79ff.</ref> In particular Redbelly is a method that scales [[Consensus Protocols]] to 1,000 or more machines.
 +
 
 +
===Steward===
 +
Since all data stored on any [[Blockchain]] is public, other methods, like side chain or other trusted sources of control of user data need to exist. The Sovrin Foundation created the [https://sovrin.org/sovrin-stewards-helping-create-self-sovereign-identity-for-all/ role of Steward] which would not be numerous which would store only public user data, like keys. This role would enable [[User Agent]]s would store private data. These agents could be hosted on user smart phones or on proxy servers under user control. See the worked out example of [https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php/Phone_as_Health_Care_Credential Phone as Health Care Credential] as one possible implementation of an agent that supports [[Self-issued Identifier]]s.
 +
 
 +
===Use Cases===
 +
* The first commercial blockchain produce frrm Bellcore in the late 1990's failed as a publicly verifiable proof chain.
 +
* The Bitcoin phenomenon is still showing (2019) signs that it has legs and will continue as a source of hiding wealth. It is less successful as a method of exchange of value except for extortion. The [https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm1216 US Treasury has ruled]that any transaction for more that $3000 with a financial institution must be reported to [[FinCEN]].
 +
* The Ethereum concept of smart contracts has show some value and continues (2019) as a support mechanism for a variety of start up enterprises.
 +
* The [[Distributed Identity]] concept has moved from community group to standards work group in the W3C, which should indicate that a standard will soon be issued. If you look at that web page you will see some of the challenges they face getting adoptions.
 +
* The idea of blockchain itself is sound, the question is where the anarchy of [[Distributed Ledger Technology]] Is the best solution. Several centralized ledger solutions from Central Banks, and others shows that other solution may win in the end.<ref>Reuters, '''Explainer: Central Bank Digital Currencies: Moving Towards Reality?''' New York Times (2020-01-24) https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/01/24/business/24reuters-cenbank-digital-currencies-explainer.html</ref>
 +
 
 +
===Threat Analysis===
 +
ASC X9 produced a comprehensive [https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/ascx9/ascx9tr542021 Blockchain Risk Assessment Framework] (2021) This is from the financial services industry standards arm, so it focuses on the use in value transfer and smart contracts rather than identifiers. <blockquote>This technical report (TR) provides a framework for the performance of operational risk assessments on blockchain systems and applications within a distributed network. Operational risks include information technology (IT) and information security (IS) areas. IT includes interoperability, resiliency, accessibility, and software maintenance. IS includes data integrity, confidentiality, authentication, authorization, and accountability (logging capability). This report features some aspects of application risks including data accuracy, version control, backwards compatibility, and other usability functions.</blockquote>
 +
* Report focuses on a [[Permissioned Blockchain]] system, one in which some control and governance, established by agreement of the parties participating in the system, exists to determine who or what is allowed to read, write, or in other ways manage, operate, or govern the system. Some blockchain systems are public and considered ‘permissionless’ such that anyone with the requisite hardware, software, and skill can participate in all or most activities of the network. These types of systems may introduce additional risks beyond the scope of this report.
 +
The report makes it clear that it is not an [[Assessment Criteria]] That can be used by auditors to evaluate an implementation, but it does create an informal questionnaire that can be used by architects and developers to create secure implementations. Some of the points raised are written to support existing infrastructure in the financial industry, and so are not really well aligned with the [[Anarchy]] implicit in the W3C did core spec. The following are the questionnaire headings from section 5.3 on Trust and Resilience:
 +
# Cryptographic algorithms - only approved algorithms may be used
 +
# Public key infrastructures - the report assumes and existing PKI that would be in place, for example for HTTPS
 +
# Resilience, data persistence, and continuity of operations - these are bankers that are responsible for availability of the system
 +
# Identity management - this is a bit short and encompasses all entities from end users to smart contracts.
 +
 
 +
==Adoptions and Guidence==
 +
* [https://www.mitre.org/publications/technical-papers/blockchain-technology-for-government BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY FOR GOVERNMENT ] 2018-04 <blockquote>This document presents an introduction to blockchain technology with a specific focus on the core technologies, platforms, and applications that may be beneficial to MITRE's government sponsors. The document is intended to introduce MITRE and its sponsor to blockchain technology, and establish a base of knowledge upon which to further explore MITRE sponsor blockchain use cases and research. An introduction to blockchain and its critical components including cryptography, consensus, and distributed ledgers is provided. Public and permissioned blockchains are compared, and a framework is provided that outlines when it is beneficial to use blockchain solutions. Use cases applicable to MITRE sponsors such as healthcare, identity, supply chain, and the Internet of Things (IoT) are considered. A survey of leading permissioned blockchains such as Ethereum and Tendermint is presented, and important emerging features such as private transactions and state channels that strengthen enterprise blockchains are discussed. While public blockchains provide the most security as they are designed to operate in a trust-less environment, government users will be most interested in a '''permissioned blockchain'''.</blockquote>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 +
<references />
 +
 +
===Other Materials===
 +
* On an humorous note there is no evidence that that the block chain of memory management was ever concatenated into the single word blockchain before Santoshi's development with his core supporters,<ref>Stack Exchange, ''Who coined the term block-chain?'' https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/4454/who-coined-the-term-block-chain</ref> but the use of the term "Free Block Chain" is in common use in computer operating system designs almost from the beginning. For example see this [https://www.memorymanagement.org/glossary/f.html Memory Management Reference].
 +
* More detail on the general form can be found in the wiki page [[Immutable Logs]].
 +
* [[Blockchain Privacy]] describes some of the positive moves taken to improve the Privacy features of blockchain.
 +
* [https://www.linkedin.com/company/federal-blockchain-news/ Federal Blockchain News] on linked in.
  
−
[[Category:Glossary]]
+
[[Category: Glossary]]
 +
[[Category: Cryptography]]
 +
[[Category: Proof]]

Latest revision as of 22:59, 15 February 2024

Full Title or Meme

Blockchain will solve all Identifier Trust problems, provided you have infallible programmers and the energy of a small sun available to power it.

Context

The technology for Block Chain itself has been around since the beginning of the century. These simple chains allowed non-revocable commitments by creating a series of blocks that included a collection of all of the block hashes received since the last update plus the hash of that last update. The has of the current block update is calculated and published in a public place plus being added to the next update in sequence. Thus each entry onto the block chain cannot be changed as so is known as one of many Immutable Logs. This feature is required to block repudiation of an action. For example if the block records the transfer of coins from one entity to another, the chain will prevent the original owner of the coin from transferring that same coin later to another entity. Thus the problem of double spending of the same coin is blocked.

That’s all in theory, of course. As John Kenneth Galbraith put it, “A constant in the history of money is that every remedy is reliably a new source of abuse.”

One comprehensive early report on the use of Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology in Identity and Access Management was published from a Kantara discussion group.[1]

It is not at all clear where the single word term "Blockchain" was initiated. The first use found in the Bitcoin archives of the two word Block Chain was a conversation between Hal Finney & Satoshi on 2008-11-09 where Hal writes: 

it is mentioned that if a broadcast transaction does not reach all nodes, it is OK, as it will get into the block chain before long.

A good summary of the steps leading to the current use of blockchains.


Simple Chains

Block chains were first commercialized by Bellcore which published the hash of each day's update in the New York Times.[2] (This appears to be the first public ledger. Although township records could be considered as holding that honor.) An academic paper was published by Haber and Stornetta in 1991. [3] Surety. LLC is a continuation of that service that was still available in 2018. In this instantiation, block chain got its Non-Repudiation from the immutability of the hash published in the New York Times which became publicly available the very next day in nearly every library in the United States. This method was based on a centralized steward as are most current Decentralized ID methods. The Bellcore implemented solution was an immutable chain of blocks, but did not call itself a block chain.

Proof of Work

The point of proof of work is to randomize the choice for the source node for the next block in the chain. This will allow trust to be established for the case where less that 50% of the node are colluding to subvert the chain. Thus is created the trust, or non-repudiation of contents of the block chain.

  • The first successful block chain with distributed ledger was created by the pseudonymous S. Nakamoto[4] which resulted in the highly popular Anonymous money known as Bitcoin.
  • Mark Russinovich did an interesting calculation that showed that this pow scheme was, in May of 2018, consuming as much power as the entire country of Denmark.[5]
  • Other estimates put the energy requirements at the level of all electricity generated today will be needed for bitcoin in a few years.[6]
  • Bitcoin Mining Company Buys Entire Coal Power Plant The company is burning through 600,000 tons of coal per year. 2021-09-27

Proof of Stake

In the attempt to overcome the cost of the "Proof of Work" source of trust, new methods are proposed to select the source of the next approved block of the chain. Some sort of randomization is required to ensure that a minority of the participant cannot overcome the trust, or non-reputability of the chain.

Problems

  • The current problem that many architects are trying to solve with block chaining relate to the concentration of user information in a small number of very large companies.
  • There are some efforts to reduce the power consumption. If those work, it looks like the solution will just be some other trust framework, but with a different name. For example the proposal of Hardjono et al.[7] goes to a Resilient system like the internet, which is, of necessity, single rooted even though nearly all components can work independently for a time, just as the internet itself functions today.
  • There has been no significant uptake of block chaining with distributed ledger in real world businesses other than money laundering.[8][9]
  • The Risks of Cryptocurrencies[10] have been well documented at least since Peter Neumann listed some of them in June 2018. But the hope and hype continue to inflate their value, albeit with wild swings in value. Neumann's conclusion was to quote "the philosopher WOPR in the movie WarGames, 'The only winning move is not to play.'"
  • Consider the once-soaring value of Bitcoin: the ideological enclave of cryptocurrency evangelists. In Forbes, Jason Bloomberg wrote that “most of the noise around both blockchain and crypto is little more than the community talking to itself - a massive ‘echo chamber.’ ” We like to imagine ourselves as cannily seeing through such echo chambers - the self-reinforcing intellectual snow globes of people who get all their information from one another, who imagine that all the world works like their particular corner of it.[11] A similar "echo chamber" is building the case for Decentralized IDs where dissident options are shouted down. Only the communicant members of their religion have a voice. This was made clear on 2019-02-10 when the W3C called their uses cases "out of touch with reality".
  • What's Blockchain Actually Good for, Anyway? For Now, Not Much. Not long ago, blockchain technology was touted as a way to track tuna, bypass banks, and preserve Property records. Reality has proved a much tougher challenge.
  • Forget erasure: why blockchain is really incompatible with GDPR by Elizabeth M. Renieris (2019-09-24)
  • All data on a Blockchain is public. Some solutions that try to minimize the data on the Blockchain are described below, but none of them addresses the problem of linkage. While technically a real-world user could have as many Pseudonyms as desired, it is not practical for a variety of reasons to expect that normal users could handle more than a few. Such as one for social, one for business, one for medical data, and so on. With each of these Pseudonyms the use from one Web site to another can be mapped and these maps can be matched to real-world users.

Anarchy

Perhaps the biggest threat from blockchains is that it will succeed at removing all societal functions from control by government. If Blockchain meets its own goals, there will be no limits on what people can do, and so no limit to their excesses. Society will just collapse. Some attempt so limit the damage of blockchain follow.

The Crypto Trap

Very early messages from Satoshi claimed that "participants can be anonymous". This his been an article of faith with the cypto currency and Identifier developers. It turns out to be false.[12] Even Bitcoin payment [or any DLT transaction] is captured in its blockchain, a permanent, unchangeable, and entirely public record of every transaction in the Bitcoin network. It protects the ledger by making everyone in the Bitcoin economy a witness to every transaction. Every criminal payment, in some sense, is a smoking gun in broad daylight.

Solutions

Most of the solutions rely either on permissions for participants in the block chain process, which implies some source of trust to select the participants, or some less costly source of randomness in selecting the next node to "win" in the contest to submit the next block.[13] Most of these solutions derive from the Byzantine Generals' Problem which is a cryptographic solution to making decisions when there is a lack of trust among the deciders.[14]

Side Chains

  • A variety of additions to the Block Chain repertoire include a variety of simple chains (see above) rooted every so often in a "Proof-of-xxx" scheme have been proposed.
  • The Sidetree Protocol: Scalable DPKI for Decentralized Identity on the DIF web site.
  • Microsoft Launches Decentralized Identity Tool on Bitcoin Blockchain[15] which gets better performance at less cost with a technique which is derived from sidechains[16]. A test registration is available at this site.

Alogrand

One of the earlier solutions was Alogrand developed at MIT.

Simplest Solutions

The InterPlanetary File System IPFS can be sufficiently secure block chain for some purposes like Self-Sovereign Identity where the Did:orb method is constructed entirely using IPFS and Certificate Transparency.

LAMINA1

LAMINA1 is a new Layer-1 chain purpose built for the Open Metaverse.] The brainchild of Neal Stephenson (Chairman), who first [https://www.lamina1.com/ the Metaverse in his 1992 million-selling book Snow Crash, and Peter Vessenes (CEO), a foundational leader from the early days of Bitcoin, Lamina1 is a Layer-1 blockchain purpose-built to empower the Open Metaverse. Lamina1’s chain technology, cryptographic model and extensive intellectual property partnerships (to be announced throughout 2022) will establish it as the preferred destination for this generation’s most creative minds — those who are crafting the digital societies of the future. It is the first provably carbon-negative blockchain in the world.

Blockchain Consensus

We have describe two of the ways at achieving consensus: proof-of-work and proof-of-stake, but these are not the only ways to achieve that. Several interesting alternate are described by Gramoli and Tang[17] In particular Redbelly is a method that scales Consensus Protocols to 1,000 or more machines.

Steward

Since all data stored on any Blockchain is public, other methods, like side chain or other trusted sources of control of user data need to exist. The Sovrin Foundation created the role of Steward which would not be numerous which would store only public user data, like keys. This role would enable User Agents would store private data. These agents could be hosted on user smart phones or on proxy servers under user control. See the worked out example of Phone as Health Care Credential as one possible implementation of an agent that supports Self-issued Identifiers.

Use Cases

  • The first commercial blockchain produce frrm Bellcore in the late 1990's failed as a publicly verifiable proof chain.
  • The Bitcoin phenomenon is still showing (2019) signs that it has legs and will continue as a source of hiding wealth. It is less successful as a method of exchange of value except for extortion. The US Treasury has ruledthat any transaction for more that $3000 with a financial institution must be reported to FinCEN.
  • The Ethereum concept of smart contracts has show some value and continues (2019) as a support mechanism for a variety of start up enterprises.
  • The Distributed Identity concept has moved from community group to standards work group in the W3C, which should indicate that a standard will soon be issued. If you look at that web page you will see some of the challenges they face getting adoptions.
  • The idea of blockchain itself is sound, the question is where the anarchy of Distributed Ledger Technology Is the best solution. Several centralized ledger solutions from Central Banks, and others shows that other solution may win in the end.[18]

Threat Analysis

ASC X9 produced a comprehensive Blockchain Risk Assessment Framework (2021) This is from the financial services industry standards arm, so it focuses on the use in value transfer and smart contracts rather than identifiers.
This technical report (TR) provides a framework for the performance of operational risk assessments on blockchain systems and applications within a distributed network. Operational risks include information technology (IT) and information security (IS) areas. IT includes interoperability, resiliency, accessibility, and software maintenance. IS includes data integrity, confidentiality, authentication, authorization, and accountability (logging capability). This report features some aspects of application risks including data accuracy, version control, backwards compatibility, and other usability functions.
  • Report focuses on a Permissioned Blockchain system, one in which some control and governance, established by agreement of the parties participating in the system, exists to determine who or what is allowed to read, write, or in other ways manage, operate, or govern the system. Some blockchain systems are public and considered ‘permissionless’ such that anyone with the requisite hardware, software, and skill can participate in all or most activities of the network. These types of systems may introduce additional risks beyond the scope of this report.

The report makes it clear that it is not an Assessment Criteria That can be used by auditors to evaluate an implementation, but it does create an informal questionnaire that can be used by architects and developers to create secure implementations. Some of the points raised are written to support existing infrastructure in the financial industry, and so are not really well aligned with the Anarchy implicit in the W3C did core spec. The following are the questionnaire headings from section 5.3 on Trust and Resilience:

  1. Cryptographic algorithms - only approved algorithms may be used
  2. Public key infrastructures - the report assumes and existing PKI that would be in place, for example for HTTPS
  3. Resilience, data persistence, and continuity of operations - these are bankers that are responsible for availability of the system
  4. Identity management - this is a bit short and encompasses all entities from end users to smart contracts.

Adoptions and Guidence

  • BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY FOR GOVERNMENT 2018-04
    This document presents an introduction to blockchain technology with a specific focus on the core technologies, platforms, and applications that may be beneficial to MITRE's government sponsors. The document is intended to introduce MITRE and its sponsor to blockchain technology, and establish a base of knowledge upon which to further explore MITRE sponsor blockchain use cases and research. An introduction to blockchain and its critical components including cryptography, consensus, and distributed ledgers is provided. Public and permissioned blockchains are compared, and a framework is provided that outlines when it is beneficial to use blockchain solutions. Use cases applicable to MITRE sponsors such as healthcare, identity, supply chain, and the Internet of Things (IoT) are considered. A survey of leading permissioned blockchains such as Ethereum and Tendermint is presented, and important emerging features such as private transactions and state channels that strengthen enterprise blockchains are discussed. While public blockchains provide the most security as they are designed to operate in a trust-less environment, government users will be most interested in a permissioned blockchain.

References

  1. ↑ Thomas Hardjono and Eve Maler, Report from the Blockchain and Smart Contracts Discussion Group to the Kantara Initiative. (2017-06-05) Kantara https://kantarainitiative.org/download/6828
  2. ↑ BELLCORE SPINS OFF NEW COMPANY TO OFFER DIGITAL NOTARY (TM)(SM) SERVICE http://seclists.org/interesting-people/1994/Mar/100
  3. ↑ Stuart Haber +1, How To Time-Stamp a Digital Document Journal of Cryptography (1991 data rec'd 1990-08-19) https://www.math.columbia.edu/~bayer/papers/Timestamp_BHS93.pdf
  4. ↑ S. Nakamoto. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash. The proponents of bitcoin had a radical agenda, which was to disintermediate incumbents and remove those entities that have responsibility for creating trust, such as financial services firms and central banks. system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, 2008.
  5. ↑ Mark Russinovich Microsoft Build (2018-05-06) https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/2018/BRK2507
  6. ↑ Adam Rodgers, The Hard Math Behind Bitcoin's Global Warming Problem. (2017-12-17) Wired https://www.wired.com/story/bitcoin-global-warming/
  7. ↑ Thos Hardjono, +2 Towards a Design Philosophy for Inter-operable Blockchain Systems MIT May 16, 2018 [1]
  8. ↑ Andrew Orlowski, Blockchain study finds 0.00% success rate and vendors don't call back when asked for evidence. (2018-11-30) The Register https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/11/30/blockchain_study_finds_0_per_cent_success_rate/
  9. ↑ Nathaniel Popper, Bitcoin Has Lost Steam. But Criminals Still Love It. (2020-01-28) New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/technology/bitcoin-black-market.html?auth=login-email&login=email
  10. ↑ Peter B Neumann, The Risks of Cryptocurrencies (2018-06) CACM Vol 61 No. 6 p. 20ff
  11. ↑ Sasha Chapin, Small Worlds (2018-12-16) New York Times Magazine p. 13-15
  12. ↑ Andy Greenberg, The Crypto Trap. Wired 30 No 6. (2022-06) pp.61ff.
  13. ↑ Zubin Koticha, Proof of Stake and the History of Distributed Consensus: Part 1, Nakamoto Consensus, Byzantine Fault Tolerance, Hybrid Consensus, Thunderella. (2018-09-04) Thunder https://medium.com/thunderofficial/proof-of-stake-and-the-history-of-distributed-consensus-part-1-nakamoto-consensus-byzantine-176e0156316e
  14. ↑ Lamport, L.; Shostak, R.; Pease, M., The Byzantine Generals Problem. (1982) ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems. 4 (3): 387-389. doi:10.1145/357172.357176
  15. ↑ Leigh Cue, Microsoft Launches Decentralized Identity Tool on Bitcoin Blockchain (2019-05-13) Coindesk https://www.coindesk.com/microsoft-launches-decentralized-identity-tool-on-bitcoin-blockchain
  16. ↑ Daniel Buchner, Toward scalable decentralized identifier systems . Microsoft Blog (2019-05-13) https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Azure-Active-Directory-Identity/Toward-scalable-decentralized-identifier-systems/ba-p/560168
  17. ↑ Vincent Gramoli and Qiang Tang, The Future of Blockchain Consensus CACM 66 No. 7 (2023-07) p 79ff.
  18. ↑ Reuters, Explainer: Central Bank Digital Currencies: Moving Towards Reality? New York Times (2020-01-24) https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/01/24/business/24reuters-cenbank-digital-currencies-explainer.html

Other Materials

  • On an humorous note there is no evidence that that the block chain of memory management was ever concatenated into the single word blockchain before Santoshi's development with his core supporters,[1] but the use of the term "Free Block Chain" is in common use in computer operating system designs almost from the beginning. For example see this Memory Management Reference.
  • More detail on the general form can be found in the wiki page Immutable Logs.
  • Blockchain Privacy describes some of the positive moves taken to improve the Privacy features of blockchain.
  • Federal Blockchain News on linked in.
  • ↑ Stack Exchange, Who coined the term block-chain? https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/4454/who-coined-the-term-block-chain
    • Retrieved from "http://tcwiki.azurewebsites.net/index.php?title=Blockchain&oldid=19939"