Difference between revisions of "Consent Receipt"

From MgmtWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Current draft of the Spec)
(Current draft of the Spec)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
[https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/infosharing/Consent+Receipt+Specification?preview=/76447870/101810304/Consent%20Receipt%20Specification%201_1_0%20DRAFT%208.docx Current draft of Kantara Initiative Technical Specification Recommendation, Consent Receipt Specification  ] Version:1.1.0 DRAFT 8  Date:2018-02-20
 
[https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/infosharing/Consent+Receipt+Specification?preview=/76447870/101810304/Consent%20Receipt%20Specification%201_1_0%20DRAFT%208.docx Current draft of Kantara Initiative Technical Specification Recommendation, Consent Receipt Specification  ] Version:1.1.0 DRAFT 8  Date:2018-02-20
 +
 +
Warning: this document is based the 1980 OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data [OECD] focusing on consent using the ISO 29100 [ISO 29100:2011] lexicon, which means that the terms are stilted and do not reflect current usages.
  
 
==Implementation on Microsoft ASP.NET Core 2 Web Site==
 
==Implementation on Microsoft ASP.NET Core 2 Web Site==

Revision as of 09:48, 2 June 2018

Full Title or Meme

Consent Receipt generated by an IDESG compliant Identifier Provider

Context

The current design of a Consent receipt is based on the theory of a transaction between a pii data controller and a pii data principle.

In the context of an IDESG identifier provider best practice it was based on a state at the IdP of a user immediately after a user initiated profile update. Note that user here means whatever sort of entity has the identifier shown as "user name". It cannot be inferred that the identified user has any rights under any regulation, as that would be a privacy exposure of its own.

It might be useful for the consent receipt to carry an indication of the context (aka receipt type) at its generation.

Current draft of the Spec

Draft on which this implementation was based is listed below. In theory practice is the same as theory, in practice it is not.

Current draft of Kantara Initiative Technical Specification Recommendation, Consent Receipt Specification Version:1.1.0 DRAFT 8 Date:2018-02-20

Warning: this document is based the 1980 OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data [OECD] focusing on consent using the ISO 29100 [ISO 29100:2011] lexicon, which means that the terms are stilted and do not reflect current usages.

Implementation on Microsoft ASP.NET Core 2 Web Site

Json output

Generated on a partial implementation on 2018-06-01

 {
 "version": "KI-CR-v1.1.0",
 "jurisdiction": "WA",
 "consentTimestamp": "",
 "collectionMethod": "user input",
 "consentReceiptID": "f4de5671-bd2c-4e54-b855-76f84f5b407e",
 "publicKey": null,
 "language": "en",
 "piiPrincipalId": null,
 "piiControllers": "IDESGidp",
 "policyUrl": "http://tomjones.us/CRpolicy",
 "services": null,
 "sensitive": "false",
 "spiCat": null
 }