Difference between revisions of "Consent Receipt"

From MgmtWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Context)
(Context)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
In the context of an IDESG identifier provider best practice it was based on a state at the IdP of a user immediately after a user initiated profile update.
 
In the context of an IDESG identifier provider best practice it was based on a state at the IdP of a user immediately after a user initiated profile update.
  
It might be useful for the consent receipt to carry an indication of the context at its generation.
+
It might be useful for the consent receipt to carry an indication of the context (aka receipt type) at its generation.
  
 
===Current draft of the Spec===
 
===Current draft of the Spec===

Revision as of 10:30, 2 June 2018

Full Title or Meme

Consent Receipt generated by an IDESG compliant Identifier Provider

Context

The current design of a Consent receipt is based on the theory of a transaction between a pii data controller and a pii data principle.

In the context of an IDESG identifier provider best practice it was based on a state at the IdP of a user immediately after a user initiated profile update.

It might be useful for the consent receipt to carry an indication of the context (aka receipt type) at its generation.

Current draft of the Spec

Draft on which this implementation was based is listed below. In theory practice is the same as theory, in practice it is not.

Current draft of spec Version:1.1.0 DRAFT 83 Date:2018-02-20

Implementation on Microsoft ASP.NET Core 2 Web Site

Json output

 {
 "version": "KI-CR-v1.1.0",
 "jurisdiction": "WA",
 "consentTimestamp": "",
 "collectionMethod": "user input",
 "consentReceiptID": "f4de5671-bd2c-4e54-b855-76f84f5b407e",
 "publicKey": null,
 "language": "en",
 "piiPrincipalId": null,
 "piiControllers": "IDESGidp",
 "policyUrl": "http://tomjones.us/CRpolicy",
 "services": null,
 "sensitive": "false",
 "spiCat": null
 }