Difference between revisions of "Herd Privacy"
From MgmtWiki
(→Problems) |
(→Problems) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Problems== | ==Problems== | ||
| − | One very good repudiation of this stated the following<ref>Joshua Brustein, '' | + | One very good repudiation of this stated the following<ref>Joshua Brustein, ''Crytpo's $8,6 Billion Private Eye'', Business Week (2022-09-26) pp. 19ff</ref><blockquote></blockquote> |
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category: Privacy]] | ||
Revision as of 17:22, 26 September 2022
Ful Title or Meme
A wide range of anonymization techniques have been proposed that give the illusion of Privacy.
Context
- Most of the "anonymization" techniques depend on removing all Personally Identifiable Information from the document for from a data base. The fact that this is pure fiction has not stoped the spread of this idea.
- The US Census anonymized census data to provide privacy.
- Bitcoin explicitly claimed it remained completely anonymous even though every participate has a public key which acts just like an Identifier.
- THe W3C Credential Community Group claimed Herd Privacy by virtue of the large number of identifiers flooding around.
Problems
One very good repudiation of this stated the following[1]References
- ↑ Joshua Brustein, Crytpo's $8,6 Billion Private Eye, Business Week (2022-09-26) pp. 19ff
