Difference between revisions of "Privacy Hides Crimes"

From MgmtWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Problems)
(Problems)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
 
On Tuesday, Bloomberg Law reported the Securities Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission could impose as soon as today total fines of $2 billion on major Wall Street institutions -- about a billion dollars more than previously expected -- following a probe into the use of encrypted messaging apps that violate SEC and CTFC rules. Chats that auto disappear aren't what these watchdogs have in mind for document-keeping.
 
On Tuesday, Bloomberg Law reported the Securities Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission could impose as soon as today total fines of $2 billion on major Wall Street institutions -- about a billion dollars more than previously expected -- following a probe into the use of encrypted messaging apps that violate SEC and CTFC rules. Chats that auto disappear aren't what these watchdogs have in mind for document-keeping.
  
Financial regulators mandate traders and brokers monitor, record, and preserve their staffers' written communications, creating a paper trail used in compliance checks for investor-protection laws. But then came the pandemic and remote work, allowing bankers' business and personal lives to entwine in more ways than one. Work across both company and personal devices and email accounts proliferated. And perhaps even worse, off-limits encrypted messaging apps like WhatsApp and Signal became a favored platform for client meetings, investment term discussions, and other business. Both apps are privacy-focused and allow users to set messages to disappear after a set amount of time. The result? The dissolution of hard records and a subsequent oversight nightmare. The price for such a transgression? Near record regulatory fines. Nearly every major Wall Street player has been negotiating settlement terms with the SEC and CTFC for months, with a JPMorgan payout in December over the same violations providing a possible precedent:
+
Financial regulators mandate traders and brokers monitor, record, and preserve their staffers' written communications, creating a paper trail used in compliance checks for investor-protection laws. But then came the pandemic and remote work, allowing bankers' business and personal lives to entwine in more ways than one. Work across both company and personal devices and email accounts proliferated. And perhaps even worse, off-limits encrypted messaging apps like WhatsApp and Signal became a favored platform for client meetings, investment term discussions, and other business. Both apps are privacy-focused and allow users to set messages to disappear after a set amount of time. The result? The dissolution of hard records and a subsequent oversight nightmare.  
  
JPMorgan paid $200 million to the two regulators in December, after admitting widespread non-compliance with record-keeping laws across its companies. Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Barclays, Deutsche Bank, and Credit Suisse have set aside similar amounts in preparation, sources tell Bloomberg Law, while smaller banks like Jefferies are expecting around $80 million in fines.
+
The price for such a transgression? Near record regulatory fines. Nearly every major Wall Street player has been negotiating settlement terms with the SEC and CTFC for months, with a JPMorgan payout in December over the same violations providing a possible precedent, JPMorgan paid $200 million to the two regulators in December, after admitting widespread non-compliance with record-keeping laws across its companies. Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Barclays, Deutsche Bank, and Credit Suisse have set aside similar amounts in preparation, sources tell Bloomberg Law, while smaller banks like Jefferies are expecting around $80 million in fines.
 
The fines far outclass the $15 million penalty slapped on Morgan Stanley in 2006 over its failure to preserve emails -- but unlike encrypted messaging apps, email archives are easily attainable with a warrant or a subpoena.
 
The fines far outclass the $15 million penalty slapped on Morgan Stanley in 2006 over its failure to preserve emails -- but unlike encrypted messaging apps, email archives are easily attainable with a warrant or a subpoena.
 
Crime and Punishment: According to a Wall Street Journal report last month, the massive fees are irking banks' legal departments because neither agency is alleging any crime -- such as fraud or harm to clients -- other than non-compliance with record-keeping rules. But both regulators say a failure to keep communications records has already hindered several investigations. It's like they always say, the potential cover-up of any potential crime is worse than any potential crime itself.
 
Crime and Punishment: According to a Wall Street Journal report last month, the massive fees are irking banks' legal departments because neither agency is alleging any crime -- such as fraud or harm to clients -- other than non-compliance with record-keeping rules. But both regulators say a failure to keep communications records has already hindered several investigations. It's like they always say, the potential cover-up of any potential crime is worse than any potential crime itself.

Latest revision as of 14:27, 2 October 2022

Full Title or Meme

Privacy can be socially harmful, especially when it is used to hide crimes.

Context

Free and fair governance depends on visibility of the processes of government.

Problems

WhatsApp, the free messaging and video calling app, may end up costing Wall Street $2 Billion in Penalties (2022-09-27)

On Tuesday, Bloomberg Law reported the Securities Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission could impose as soon as today total fines of $2 billion on major Wall Street institutions -- about a billion dollars more than previously expected -- following a probe into the use of encrypted messaging apps that violate SEC and CTFC rules. Chats that auto disappear aren't what these watchdogs have in mind for document-keeping.

Financial regulators mandate traders and brokers monitor, record, and preserve their staffers' written communications, creating a paper trail used in compliance checks for investor-protection laws. But then came the pandemic and remote work, allowing bankers' business and personal lives to entwine in more ways than one. Work across both company and personal devices and email accounts proliferated. And perhaps even worse, off-limits encrypted messaging apps like WhatsApp and Signal became a favored platform for client meetings, investment term discussions, and other business. Both apps are privacy-focused and allow users to set messages to disappear after a set amount of time. The result? The dissolution of hard records and a subsequent oversight nightmare.

The price for such a transgression? Near record regulatory fines. Nearly every major Wall Street player has been negotiating settlement terms with the SEC and CTFC for months, with a JPMorgan payout in December over the same violations providing a possible precedent, JPMorgan paid $200 million to the two regulators in December, after admitting widespread non-compliance with record-keeping laws across its companies. Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Barclays, Deutsche Bank, and Credit Suisse have set aside similar amounts in preparation, sources tell Bloomberg Law, while smaller banks like Jefferies are expecting around $80 million in fines. The fines far outclass the $15 million penalty slapped on Morgan Stanley in 2006 over its failure to preserve emails -- but unlike encrypted messaging apps, email archives are easily attainable with a warrant or a subpoena. Crime and Punishment: According to a Wall Street Journal report last month, the massive fees are irking banks' legal departments because neither agency is alleging any crime -- such as fraud or harm to clients -- other than non-compliance with record-keeping rules. But both regulators say a failure to keep communications records has already hindered several investigations. It's like they always say, the potential cover-up of any potential crime is worse than any potential crime itself.

References