Difference between revisions of "TPM"
From MgmtWiki
(→Solution) |
m (→Solution) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*Version 1 of the TPM was always instantiated in a hardware chip and there was a great deal of promotion of the concept of hardware protected security. This solution was complex for the user to control. | *Version 1 of the TPM was always instantiated in a hardware chip and there was a great deal of promotion of the concept of hardware protected security. This solution was complex for the user to control. | ||
*Version 2 of the TPM may be implemented in software which was loaded into a [[Trusted Execution Environment]] which introduces complexity of implementation. | *Version 2 of the TPM may be implemented in software which was loaded into a [[Trusted Execution Environment]] which introduces complexity of implementation. | ||
| − | ** The software for an [https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity16/technical-sessions/presentation/raj fTPM: A Software-Only Implementation of a TPM Chip] was | + | ** The software for an [https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity16/technical-sessions/presentation/raj fTPM: A Software-Only Implementation of a TPM Chip] was created by David Wooten and Paul England at Microsoft. (2016-08-10-12) |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 11:55, 3 December 2021
Contents
Full Title
Trusted Platform Module is a specific case of a Trusted Execution Environment.
Problem
Attestation of the security of a remote (User) device.
Solution
- Version 1 of the TPM was always instantiated in a hardware chip and there was a great deal of promotion of the concept of hardware protected security. This solution was complex for the user to control.
- Version 2 of the TPM may be implemented in software which was loaded into a Trusted Execution Environment which introduces complexity of implementation.
- The software for an fTPM: A Software-Only Implementation of a TPM Chip was created by David Wooten and Paul England at Microsoft. (2016-08-10-12)
