Difference between revisions of "On Truth and Falsehood"
From MgmtWiki
(Created page with "==full Title or Meme== ==Context== ==References== Category:Philosophy") |
m (→Context) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == | + | ==Full Title or Meme== |
| + | How are we to judge the truth of a belief? | ||
==Context== | ==Context== | ||
| + | * Bertrand Russel ''On Truth and Falsehood'' <blockquote>as regards knowledge of truths, there is a dualism. We may believe what is false as well as what is true. We know that on very many subjects different people hold different and incompatible opinions: hence some beliefs must be erroneous. Since erroneous beliefs are often held just as strongly as true beliefs, it becomes a difficult question how they are to be distinguished from true beliefs. How are we to know, in a given case, that our belief is not erroneous? This is a question of the very greatest difficulty, to which no completely satisfactory answer is possible. </blockquote> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
[[Category:Philosophy]] | [[Category:Philosophy]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:43, 19 August 2021
Full Title or Meme
How are we to judge the truth of a belief?
Context
- Bertrand Russel On Truth and Falsehood
as regards knowledge of truths, there is a dualism. We may believe what is false as well as what is true. We know that on very many subjects different people hold different and incompatible opinions: hence some beliefs must be erroneous. Since erroneous beliefs are often held just as strongly as true beliefs, it becomes a difficult question how they are to be distinguished from true beliefs. How are we to know, in a given case, that our belief is not erroneous? This is a question of the very greatest difficulty, to which no completely satisfactory answer is possible.
