Difference between revisions of "Namespace"
(Created page with "==Full Title or Meme== A Namespace is simply a list of names and some of their attributes. ==Context== ==References== {Category: Semantics]]") |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Context== | ==Context== | ||
+ | I am dealing with a particularly interesting challenge, wherein I don't want params that are transferred into a composed Service URL, I want some that are used in other aspects of a resulting request, like a POST body. The rub is that I have many params I would need, and don't want to start adding their generic names to the public namespace, because they are basically Service-specific | ||
+ | white_check_mark | ||
+ | eyes | ||
+ | raised_hands | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 9:00 | ||
+ | What are we doing about Service specific params used in something other than transference to a composed URL? | ||
+ | 9:01 | ||
+ | I have this example right now of one possible way I was going to do this: ?messages=method:'CollectionsQuery',tags:'foo','bar',schema:'http://schema.org/MusicPlaylist' (edited) | ||
+ | 9:01 | ||
+ | Basically one param with multiple subelements | ||
+ | 9:01 | ||
+ | no standard exists for complex json value representation in params, that I am aware of | ||
+ | 9:02 | ||
+ | that is the best representation I could think of with the use of unencoded reserved chars | ||
+ | |||
+ | this might be worth a discussion in the ID meeting later today. It is symptomatic of any attempt to create a universal semantic and why past attempts (X12, XML) have not been successful. http://microformats.org/wiki/namespaces-considered-harmful | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
− | {Category: Semantics]] | + | [{Category: Semantics]] |
Revision as of 09:26, 25 October 2021
Full Title or Meme
A Namespace is simply a list of names and some of their attributes.
Context
I am dealing with a particularly interesting challenge, wherein I don't want params that are transferred into a composed Service URL, I want some that are used in other aspects of a resulting request, like a POST body. The rub is that I have many params I would need, and don't want to start adding their generic names to the public namespace, because they are basically Service-specific white_check_mark eyes raised_hands
9:00 What are we doing about Service specific params used in something other than transference to a composed URL? 9:01 I have this example right now of one possible way I was going to do this: ?messages=method:'CollectionsQuery',tags:'foo','bar',schema:'http://schema.org/MusicPlaylist' (edited) 9:01 Basically one param with multiple subelements 9:01 no standard exists for complex json value representation in params, that I am aware of 9:02 that is the best representation I could think of with the use of unencoded reserved chars
this might be worth a discussion in the ID meeting later today. It is symptomatic of any attempt to create a universal semantic and why past attempts (X12, XML) have not been successful. http://microformats.org/wiki/namespaces-considered-harmful
References
[{Category: Semantics]]