Difference between revisions of "Discrete or Continuous"
(→Context) |
(→Context) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Context== | ==Context== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Arguments for Continuous=== | ||
Remarks on [http://motls.blogspot.com/2013/03/we-dont-live-in-simulation.html Lubos Motl’s blog] definately describe the reason why Physicists trained in calculus think discrete just won't work : | Remarks on [http://motls.blogspot.com/2013/03/we-dont-live-in-simulation.html Lubos Motl’s blog] definately describe the reason why Physicists trained in calculus think discrete just won't work : | ||
| Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
Quite generally, if the Universe were fundamentally discontinuous, it couldn’t have continuous symmetries such as the rotational symmetry, the Lorentz symmetry, and even descriptions in terms of gauge symmetries (which aren’t real full-fledged symmetries but redundancies) would be impossible. In a fundamentally discrete world, many (or infinitely many) continuous parameters would have to be precisely fine-tuned for the product to “look” invariant under the continuous transformations.” | Quite generally, if the Universe were fundamentally discontinuous, it couldn’t have continuous symmetries such as the rotational symmetry, the Lorentz symmetry, and even descriptions in terms of gauge symmetries (which aren’t real full-fledged symmetries but redundancies) would be impossible. In a fundamentally discrete world, many (or infinitely many) continuous parameters would have to be precisely fine-tuned for the product to “look” invariant under the continuous transformations.” | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===Arguments for Discrete=== | ||
| + | We can only measure discrete events at the quantum level. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 09:37, 20 April 2023
Contents
Full Title or Meme
The search for understanding about how the discrete events of an Eventful Universe can co-exist with the continuous models of space and time.
Context
Arguments for Continuous
Remarks on Lubos Motl’s blog definately describe the reason why Physicists trained in calculus think discrete just won't work :
“There is strong scientific evidence today that the world isn’t discrete (and it isn’t simulated).
We do encounter integers and discrete mathematical structures in physics but in all the cases, we may see that they’re derived or emergent. They’re just limited discrete aspects of a more general and more fundamental underlying continuous structure, or they’re a rewriting of a continuous structure into discrete variables (eigenstates in a discrete spectrum) which makes it impossible to understand the value of certain parameters.
Quite generally, if the Universe were fundamentally discontinuous, it couldn’t have continuous symmetries such as the rotational symmetry, the Lorentz symmetry, and even descriptions in terms of gauge symmetries (which aren’t real full-fledged symmetries but redundancies) would be impossible. In a fundamentally discrete world, many (or infinitely many) continuous parameters would have to be precisely fine-tuned for the product to “look” invariant under the continuous transformations.”
Arguments for Discrete
We can only measure discrete events at the quantum level.
References
Other Material
In computing a similar dichotomy is described as Digital versus Analog Computing.
