Difference between revisions of "Censorship"
From MgmtWiki
(→Definition) |
(→Context) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is it ever possible for any source of information to be without bias? | Is it ever possible for any source of information to be without bias? | ||
− | The New York Times has tried to say that they give equal airing to all points of view. But the opinion editor was fired for doing just that.<ref>James Bennet, ''When the New York Times lost its way'' (2023-12-14) The Economist https://www.economist.com/1843/2023/12/14/when-the-new-york-times-lost-its-way</ref> | + | The New York Times has tried to say that they give equal airing to all points of view. But the opinion editor was fired for doing just that when he allowed Tom Cotton, a senator from Arkansas, to express his option on the editorial page.<ref>James Bennet, ''When the New York Times lost its way'' (2023-12-14) The Economist https://www.economist.com/1843/2023/12/14/when-the-new-york-times-lost-its-way</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
[[Category: Glossary]] | [[Category: Glossary]] |
Revision as of 15:44, 14 December 2023
Definition
An attempt to control what people can read, see or say.
Context
Is it ever possible for any source of information to be without bias?
The New York Times has tried to say that they give equal airing to all points of view. But the opinion editor was fired for doing just that when he allowed Tom Cotton, a senator from Arkansas, to express his option on the editorial page.[1]
References
- ↑ James Bennet, When the New York Times lost its way (2023-12-14) The Economist https://www.economist.com/1843/2023/12/14/when-the-new-york-times-lost-its-way