Difference between revisions of "Democracy"
(→Speed) |
(→Personal) |
||
| (21 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Full Title or Meme== | ==Full Title or Meme== | ||
| − | A | + | A process of communal decision making. This can apply at the level of a standards body or a large, federated government. |
==Context== | ==Context== | ||
| − | * We must make our choice, we may have [[Democracy]] or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few. But we can't have both. Louis Brandeis. | + | * A form of government that is the worst possible, except for all of the others that have been tried so far. - Winston Churchill |
| + | * We must make our choice, we may have [[Democracy]] or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few. But we can't have both. Louis Brandeis.<ref name=Anderson>Kurt Anderson, ''Evil Geneuses'', Random House (2022) ISBN 978-1984801340</ref> | ||
* The context here is a political system that supports private property, and a capitalist economy based on private companies, all of which are regulated by the rule of law. | * The context here is a political system that supports private property, and a capitalist economy based on private companies, all of which are regulated by the rule of law. | ||
| + | * Many, including the author, predict that a [[Nodal Point]] is coming sooner or later, where any old existing [[Democracy]] will need to adapt, or die. | ||
==Problems== | ==Problems== | ||
===Inequality=== | ===Inequality=== | ||
| − | The wealth holders have always used their wealth to manipulate the system. In the feudal system it involved the struggle of the barons against the King. Once equality before the law was introduced, the wealth holders were at a disadvantage when taxes were controlled by the majority. But now they hired experts to game the democratic systems to their own advantage. In | + | The wealth holders have always used their wealth to manipulate the system. In the feudal system it involved the struggle of the barons against the King. Once equality before the law was introduced, the wealth holders were at a disadvantage when taxes were controlled by the majority. But now they hired experts to game the democratic systems to their own advantage. In Britain the law was settled by the law nobles in the supreme court of the house of Lords. In the US the wealth holders have found a way to bribe the law makers into putting judges on the Supreme Court that are friendly to their concerns to the point where any limitation on their ability to influence legislation has been ruled unconstitutional. |
| + | |||
| + | ===Racism=== | ||
| + | While it is possible to include racism as a form Inequality, it needs special attention as it has be written into both formal documents (the US constitution) to government "purity" campaigns like Burma's generals against the Rohingya Muslim minority. In "A Discussion of Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s How Democracies Die:<ref>Sheri Berman, ''A Discussion of Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s How Democracies Die'' University of Washington https://www.polisci.washington.edu/sites/polisci/files/documents/news/discussion_of_steven_levitsky_and_daniel_ziblatts_how_democracies_die.pdf</ref> a discussion on racism as a primary problem for the US is made. | ||
| + | ===The Tyranny of the Majority=== | ||
| + | Most governing documents try to avoid suppression of minority opinions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Demigogues=== | ||
| + | * a political leader who seeks support by appealing to the desires and prejudices of ordinary people rather than by using rational argument. | ||
| + | When we empower the people to govern, we inevitably empower the sophists and swindlers among them. Demagoguery is thus a danger inherent to all democracies.<ref>Emily Pears, ''Demagoguery in America'' National Affairs (2022-09) https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/demagoguery-in-america</ref> | ||
| + | Hughie Long, Donald Trump, William Jennings Bryan | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Power=== | ||
| + | Nietzsche describe the primal motivation of mankind as a will to power. | ||
==Speed== | ==Speed== | ||
| − | [[Democracy]] is a human institution and so only | + | [[Democracy]] is a human institution and so only progresses at the speeds that humans can accept. Even its founder, Solon, cautioned that: “No more good must be attempted than the nation can bear” |
Unfortunately, the speed of technological advance seems to be such that even before [[Democracy]] has adapted to one change, technology may very well have obsoleted that and moved on to the next. | Unfortunately, the speed of technological advance seems to be such that even before [[Democracy]] has adapted to one change, technology may very well have obsoleted that and moved on to the next. | ||
| − | Some have argued that technology must be freed of governmental interference and allowed to move at its own speed, but that typically ensures that many human beings will be left behind. Wired reported in 2022<ref>Elanor Cummins, ''Overclocked'', Wired (2022-07) pp 38 ff.</ref> that Robert Hassan said "for decades, network computing, which made everything from | + | Some have argued that technology must be freed of governmental interference and allowed to move at its own speed, but that typically ensures that many human beings will be left behind. Wired reported in 2022<ref>Elanor Cummins, ''Overclocked'', Wired (2022-07) pp 38 ff.</ref> that Robert Hassan said "for decades, network computing, which made everything from [[Social Media]] to Zoom possible. This allows for a kind of connectivity that collapses both space and time. The result is that democratic politics seem interminably slow relative to the pace of commerce and culture." |
| + | |||
| + | When democracies want to complete a project quickly, they most often turn to private professional enterprise, or at least to a professional with a record. In other words the government appoints a dictator with limited power and term in office. The key word here is "professional" as they are required, by law, to be responsible for their work product. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Responsibility== | ||
| + | ===Personal=== | ||
| + | * What people do in private is their own business in-so-far as it breaks no laws. | ||
| + | * What people to in public should be beyond reproach if they wish to be known for their probity. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Corporate=== | ||
| + | Milton Freeman of the Chicago School famously asserted | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| + | [[Category: Glossary]] | ||
[[Category: Philosophy]] | [[Category: Philosophy]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:51, 26 September 2024
Contents
Full Title or Meme
A process of communal decision making. This can apply at the level of a standards body or a large, federated government.
Context
- A form of government that is the worst possible, except for all of the others that have been tried so far. - Winston Churchill
- We must make our choice, we may have Democracy or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few. But we can't have both. Louis Brandeis.[1]
- The context here is a political system that supports private property, and a capitalist economy based on private companies, all of which are regulated by the rule of law.
- Many, including the author, predict that a Nodal Point is coming sooner or later, where any old existing Democracy will need to adapt, or die.
Problems
Inequality
The wealth holders have always used their wealth to manipulate the system. In the feudal system it involved the struggle of the barons against the King. Once equality before the law was introduced, the wealth holders were at a disadvantage when taxes were controlled by the majority. But now they hired experts to game the democratic systems to their own advantage. In Britain the law was settled by the law nobles in the supreme court of the house of Lords. In the US the wealth holders have found a way to bribe the law makers into putting judges on the Supreme Court that are friendly to their concerns to the point where any limitation on their ability to influence legislation has been ruled unconstitutional.
Racism
While it is possible to include racism as a form Inequality, it needs special attention as it has be written into both formal documents (the US constitution) to government "purity" campaigns like Burma's generals against the Rohingya Muslim minority. In "A Discussion of Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s How Democracies Die:[2] a discussion on racism as a primary problem for the US is made.
The Tyranny of the Majority
Most governing documents try to avoid suppression of minority opinions.
Demigogues
- a political leader who seeks support by appealing to the desires and prejudices of ordinary people rather than by using rational argument.
When we empower the people to govern, we inevitably empower the sophists and swindlers among them. Demagoguery is thus a danger inherent to all democracies.[3] Hughie Long, Donald Trump, William Jennings Bryan
Power
Nietzsche describe the primal motivation of mankind as a will to power.
Speed
Democracy is a human institution and so only progresses at the speeds that humans can accept. Even its founder, Solon, cautioned that: “No more good must be attempted than the nation can bear”
Unfortunately, the speed of technological advance seems to be such that even before Democracy has adapted to one change, technology may very well have obsoleted that and moved on to the next.
Some have argued that technology must be freed of governmental interference and allowed to move at its own speed, but that typically ensures that many human beings will be left behind. Wired reported in 2022[4] that Robert Hassan said "for decades, network computing, which made everything from Social Media to Zoom possible. This allows for a kind of connectivity that collapses both space and time. The result is that democratic politics seem interminably slow relative to the pace of commerce and culture."
When democracies want to complete a project quickly, they most often turn to private professional enterprise, or at least to a professional with a record. In other words the government appoints a dictator with limited power and term in office. The key word here is "professional" as they are required, by law, to be responsible for their work product.
Responsibility
Personal
- What people do in private is their own business in-so-far as it breaks no laws.
- What people to in public should be beyond reproach if they wish to be known for their probity.
Corporate
Milton Freeman of the Chicago School famously asserted
References
- ↑ Kurt Anderson, Evil Geneuses, Random House (2022) ISBN 978-1984801340
- ↑ Sheri Berman, A Discussion of Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s How Democracies Die University of Washington https://www.polisci.washington.edu/sites/polisci/files/documents/news/discussion_of_steven_levitsky_and_daniel_ziblatts_how_democracies_die.pdf
- ↑ Emily Pears, Demagoguery in America National Affairs (2022-09) https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/demagoguery-in-america
- ↑ Elanor Cummins, Overclocked, Wired (2022-07) pp 38 ff.
