Difference between revisions of "Free Will"
From MgmtWiki
(→Solution) |
(→Context) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Context== | ==Context== | ||
| − | * The laws governed by the current model of physical reality seem to be deterministic, which has | + | * The laws governed by the current model of physical reality seem to be deterministic, which has led some, like Standford neurobiologist Robert M. Sapolsky to say "we have no free will at all". <ref>Robert M. Sapolsky, ''Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will'' Penguin Press </ref> |
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
It really doesn't matter what we call it, [[Free Will]] or computational irreducibility (a la Stephen Wolfram} it makes no difference. | It really doesn't matter what we call it, [[Free Will]] or computational irreducibility (a la Stephen Wolfram} it makes no difference. | ||
| − | The law assumes we have [[Free Will]] and so punishes us if we transgress the laws the of land. | + | The law assumes we have [[Free Will]] and so punishes us if we transgress the laws the of land. It's hard to imagine that we would change that. |
==References== | ==References== | ||
[[Category: Philosophy]] | [[Category: Philosophy]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:08, 22 October 2024
Full Title or Meme
It remains an open question of whether we have Free Will or not.
Context
- The laws governed by the current model of physical reality seem to be deterministic, which has led some, like Standford neurobiologist Robert M. Sapolsky to say "we have no free will at all". [1]
Solution
It really doesn't matter what we call it, Free Will or computational irreducibility (a la Stephen Wolfram} it makes no difference.
The law assumes we have Free Will and so punishes us if we transgress the laws the of land. It's hard to imagine that we would change that.
References
- ↑ Robert M. Sapolsky, Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will Penguin Press
