Difference between revisions of "Accuracy"

From MgmtWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Context)
(=Other Materiel)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Full Title or Meme==
 
==Full Title or Meme==
 
[[Accuracy]] here means the probability of getting a good answer to a question.
 
[[Accuracy]] here means the probability of getting a good answer to a question.
 +
 +
For example, "the [[Accuracy]] of radiocarbon dating"
  
 
==Context==
 
==Context==
Alternate views of getting the truth or getting the best answer were considered, but rejected for our purposes.
+
Alternate views of getting the truth or getting the best answer were considered, but rejected for our purposes. Here a good answer is clearly dependent on the purpose of the answer.
  
 
==Problems==
 
==Problems==
  
 
==Examples==
 
==Examples==
 +
* According to research, trained pigeons can identify cancerous tissue in medical images with an accuracy rate of around 85% individually, and when their responses are pooled together as a "flock," their accuracy can reach up to 99%, which is comparable to human experts in the field; essentially, a flock of pigeons can be as accurate as humans in evaluating cancer screening images. Of course, either the humans or the pigeons must be properly trained first.<ref>Andrea Szöllössi, ''Pigeons identify breast cancer 'as well as humans'' BBC 2015-11-20 https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-34878151</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 +
<references />
 +
===Other Materiel===
 +
* Also see the wiki page on [[Assurance]].
  
 
[[Category: Glossary]]
 
[[Category: Glossary]]

Latest revision as of 15:08, 1 November 2024

Full Title or Meme

Accuracy here means the probability of getting a good answer to a question.

For example, "the Accuracy of radiocarbon dating"

Context

Alternate views of getting the truth or getting the best answer were considered, but rejected for our purposes. Here a good answer is clearly dependent on the purpose of the answer.

Problems

Examples

  • According to research, trained pigeons can identify cancerous tissue in medical images with an accuracy rate of around 85% individually, and when their responses are pooled together as a "flock," their accuracy can reach up to 99%, which is comparable to human experts in the field; essentially, a flock of pigeons can be as accurate as humans in evaluating cancer screening images. Of course, either the humans or the pigeons must be properly trained first.[1]

References

  1. Andrea Szöllössi, Pigeons identify breast cancer 'as well as humans BBC 2015-11-20 https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-34878151

Other Materiel