Difference between revisions of "OSCAL"
From MgmtWiki
(→Operation) |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|} | |} | ||
While OSCAL does not define policies, it translates security controls into structured formats, making compliance more efficient and scalable. | While OSCAL does not define policies, it translates security controls into structured formats, making compliance more efficient and scalable. | ||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category: Policy]] | ||
| + | [[Category: Language]] | ||
Revision as of 13:35, 9 June 2025
Definition
OSCAL (Open Security Controls Assessment Language) is not a policy language in the traditional sense, but rather a machine-readable framework designed to standardize and automate security and compliance assessments2.
Operation
Structured Data Formats – Uses XML, JSON, and YAML to represent security controls and compliance information.
Automation & Risk Management – Helps organizations streamline security assessments and reduce manual compliance efforts.
Interoperability – Enables different tools and systems to exchange security control data efficiently.
Difference Between OSCAL & Policy Languages
| Aspect | OSCAL | Traditional Policy Language |
| Purpose | Automates security assessments & compliance | Defines rules & regulations in natural language |
| Format | Machine-readable (XML, JSON, YAML) | Text-based legal or regulatory documents |
| Use Case | Security frameworks like FedRAMP, NIST RMF | Government laws, corporate policies |
| Automation | Supports automated compliance verification | Requires manual interpretation & enforcement |
While OSCAL does not define policies, it translates security controls into structured formats, making compliance more efficient and scalable.
