Difference between revisions of "Simplicity"

From MgmtWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Problem)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Problem==
 
==Problem==
Philosophers and pundits of all types have been working a both the value of a definition and the definition itself for many generations.
+
<blockquote> It may seem natural to think that, to understand a complex system, one must construct a model incorporating everything that one know about the system. However sensible this procedure may seem, in biology it has repeatedly turned out to be a sterile exercise. There are two snags with it. the first is that one finished up with a model so complicated that one cannot understand it; the point of a model is to simplify, not to confuse. The second is that if one constructs a sufficiently complex model one can make it do anything one likes by fiddling with the parameters: a model that can predict anything predicts nothing.</blockquote><ref>John Maynard Smith +1, The Origins of Life</ref?
 
 
  
 
==Solution==
 
==Solution==

Revision as of 11:35, 20 August 2018

Full Title or Meme

Things should be as simple as possible, but no simpler.[1]

Context

It’s really hard to fix, analyze or explain a complex solution.

Engineers just use an aphorism: Keep it Simple Stupid or just KISS.

Problem

It may seem natural to think that, to understand a complex system, one must construct a model incorporating everything that one know about the system. However sensible this procedure may seem, in biology it has repeatedly turned out to be a sterile exercise. There are two snags with it. the first is that one finished up with a model so complicated that one cannot understand it; the point of a model is to simplify, not to confuse. The second is that if one constructs a sufficiently complex model one can make it do anything one likes by fiddling with the parameters: a model that can predict anything predicts nothing.
<ref>John Maynard Smith +1, The Origins of Life</ref?

Solution

How many words does it take to describe the solution, not counting the UX.

With a solution like that it would be impossible to add anything that could make it better without invalidating the solution itself.

References

  1. Albert Einstein said something like that