Difference between revisions of "Identifier Management"
(→Solutions) |
(→Solutions) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
*In the wiki items 2 and 3 are combined into IAP since the distinction between the two has become blurred. | *In the wiki items 2 and 3 are combined into IAP since the distinction between the two has become blurred. | ||
*Also the last two are less interesting and also hard to separate from other functions. | *Also the last two are less interesting and also hard to separate from other functions. | ||
| + | ===Other Approaches=== | ||
| + | #UNCITRAL | ||
| + | #Underwriter's Labs | ||
| + | #Consumer Reports | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 19:30, 12 November 2019
Contents
Full Title or Meme
Identity Management (IdM) or Identity and Access Management (IAM) is a field of management in enterprises that is not clearly defined.
Context
- Customer Relationship Management (CRM) has been an issue from the earliest days of tabulating machine deployment or earlier.
- Vendor Relationship Management (VRM) has been proposed by Doc Searls[1] as the User managing their vendors.
- The goal of this wiki is to give the user the same ability to manage identity as the web sites that they visit.
Problems
The term Identity Management is not well defined.
For example: According to Gartner, IGA solutions are tools that “manage digital identity and access rights across multiple systems.” They accomplish this by aggregating and correlating identity and access rights data that is distributed throughout the IT landscape, in order to enhance control over user access. This aggregated data serves as the basis for what Gartner considers the core IGA functions:
- Identity Life Cycle and Entitlements Management
- Access Requests
- Workflow Orchestration
- Fulfillment via Automated Provisioning and Service Tickets
- Reporting and Analytics
- Role and Policy Management
- Auditing
The goal of both the user and the web site are basically the same: access to digital resources that should be under their control. In the vendor's case, it is content the user wants to see. In the user's case it is their personal information that the vendor wants to exploit. Each end has content that the other wants. It should be a natural thing for them to come to some agreement; except that the vendor has traditionally had more legal and technological expertise to tilt the playing field in their favor.
Solutions
- This wiki will focus on User Object management and User Consent managment rather than the less well defined Identity Management.
- IdM roles (as defined in the IDEF Functional Model:
- User or User Agent
- Identity Provider
- Attribute Provider
- Relying Party
- Intermediaries
- Credential Service Provider
- Registration Authorities
- The distinction between the real-world User and the digital Entity User Agent often get confused and should be disambiguated in any serious discussion.
- In the wiki items 2 and 3 are combined into IAP since the distinction between the two has become blurred.
- Also the last two are less interesting and also hard to separate from other functions.
Other Approaches
- UNCITRAL
- Underwriter's Labs
- Consumer Reports
References
- ↑ Doc Searls The Intention Economy: When Customers Take Charge (2012-04) ISBN 978-1422158524
Other Material
- Virginia Standards for Identity Managment p 30. Binding Identity to a Subscriber Provided Authenticator
