Difference between revisions of "Prolegomena to any Future Physic"

From MgmtWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(History)
(History)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
==History==
 
==History==
 
To Long, Don't Read unless you want to know how we got here.
 
To Long, Don't Read unless you want to know how we got here.
# Galileo, Newton and Einstein (1905) all agreed that reality was predictable if we just got the equations right. Granted, we could never know all the details of the present state of reality, but if we did, the universe would run on exactly that the current state and the eternal laws of reality could be calculated.
+
# Galileo (1633), Newton (1984) and Einstein (1905) all agreed that reality was predictable if we just got the equations right. Granted, we could never know all the details of the present state of reality, but if we did, the universe would run on exactly that the current state and the eternal laws of reality could be calculated.
 
# Computational; irreduciblity was clarified by Steven Wolfram<ref>Steven Wolfram, ''A New Kind of Science'' 2002 p. 1132 ISBN 781579550080</ref> in 2002.
 
# Computational; irreduciblity was clarified by Steven Wolfram<ref>Steven Wolfram, ''A New Kind of Science'' 2002 p. 1132 ISBN 781579550080</ref> in 2002.
 
# Time is real<ref>Lee Smolin, ''Time Reborn'' 2013 ISBN 978-0547511724</ref> from Lee Smolin who previously had thought it unreal. but decided in 2012 that the only way that it was possible to see the future was to let reality take its course and see what happened.
 
# Time is real<ref>Lee Smolin, ''Time Reborn'' 2013 ISBN 978-0547511724</ref> from Lee Smolin who previously had thought it unreal. but decided in 2012 that the only way that it was possible to see the future was to let reality take its course and see what happened.

Revision as of 22:02, 29 February 2024

Full Title

Physics is just a collection of Physics. We still are in need of a few more to make sense of the world we live in.

Abstract

This paper will enumerate the problems faced by the Physics of today and explore solutions that might be successful in overcoming those Problems.

Introduction

We will establish a taxonomy of terms and there meanings for the sole purpose of communication with the reader. In general the meaning of these terms is not universally acceptable and we don't wish to claim to the right to declare any meaning for other's use, but just so we can be clear about our use of the terms. We will call that part of the universe that is accessible by our senses, the Sensible Universe. The rest of the universe will be called the Hidden Universe. All that we sense about the universe appears to be in Euclidean 3-space or in Minkowski (Lorentzian) 4-space by the addition of time and relativity.

Problems

  1. Entanglement or superposition primarily as expressed by Einstein as "Spooky Actions at a Distance." We will focus here on the Anton Zeilinger experiment with two entangled photons emitted in opposite directions. Some have called these two photons as Contrary. The state of either is not knowable until a measurement is made on either of the photons. Only then do we know the state of both.
  2. Dark Stuff including the Dark Energy and Dark Matter hypotheses tell us that we know the source of neither all energy nor all momentum. Meaning that these components are not a part of the universe that is directly sensible to us.
  3. Continuous verses quantum (discrete) values.
  4. Zeno, a pupil of Parmenides, showed clearly that the infinite and the infinitesimal were absurd. But we know that the differential calculus works in predicting motion.
  5. Reconciling General Relativity to a Quantum Physic.
  6. Conservation laws are local, that is when a region in space loses energy, it must be accounted for by a flow of energy, usually as a photon. When we perform the Zeilinger experiment (or any similar one) the local state is not knowable until we get a measurement of one of the photons. In other words the energy of the local region depends on what happens somewhere else at some time else. In general, the only way to know how much energy or momentum has left a region is to measure it.
  7. It is not possible to know the path that a "particle" takes in 4-space. All we can do is generate them at one point and record when they hit a detector at another. The path they travel is never known. The principle of least-action does provide some information about the path, but it is never exact.
  8. Energy can, theoretically, have any value at all. That does not mean that energy is continuous in our sensible reality. QM teaches us that it only appears in discrete chunks, quanta. But then what is the missing energy. Well, we don't know what nonsensible energy is, only that there's a awful lot of it.

History

To Long, Don't Read unless you want to know how we got here.

  1. Galileo (1633), Newton (1984) and Einstein (1905) all agreed that reality was predictable if we just got the equations right. Granted, we could never know all the details of the present state of reality, but if we did, the universe would run on exactly that the current state and the eternal laws of reality could be calculated.
  2. Computational; irreduciblity was clarified by Steven Wolfram[1] in 2002.
  3. Time is real[2] from Lee Smolin who previously had thought it unreal. but decided in 2012 that the only way that it was possible to see the future was to let reality take its course and see what happened.

Postulate

The follow were selected in an arbitrary manner, but they seem to be suitable for physics and do not exhibit any of the above problems.

  1. All things that are measurable are discrete.
  2. The Schrodinger Equations (SE) is not directly measurable as it propagates. All it does is create a probability density distribution for future effects.

References

  1. Steven Wolfram, A New Kind of Science 2002 p. 1132 ISBN 781579550080
  2. Lee Smolin, Time Reborn 2013 ISBN 978-0547511724