Difference between revisions of "Free Speech"
From MgmtWiki
(→Problem) |
(→Problem) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Free speech is on of the bill of rights and is believed to be necessary for a functioning free society along with freedom of the press and association. | Free speech is on of the bill of rights and is believed to be necessary for a functioning free society along with freedom of the press and association. | ||
==Problem== | ==Problem== | ||
| − | Other people do not want people to say those nasty things and believe they have the right to stop them for either their own or society's welfare. | + | * Other people do not want people to say those nasty things and believe they have the right to stop them for either their own or society's welfare. |
| + | * Are libel laws consistent with free speech? The thin-skinned do not think so. | ||
| + | * Does money have the say rights as speech? Antonin Scalia in the finding of Citizen's United seems to equal money with speech. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 17:36, 5 May 2025
Full Title or Meme
Some people have nasty things to say and want protection to say them anywhere they like.
Context
Free speech is on of the bill of rights and is believed to be necessary for a functioning free society along with freedom of the press and association.
Problem
- Other people do not want people to say those nasty things and believe they have the right to stop them for either their own or society's welfare.
- Are libel laws consistent with free speech? The thin-skinned do not think so.
- Does money have the say rights as speech? Antonin Scalia in the finding of Citizen's United seems to equal money with speech.
