Difference between revisions of "Threat Modeling Guide for Web Apps"
(→=Define Mitigation Strategies) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Full Title== | ==Full Title== | ||
− | + | Threat Modeling Guide for Web Applications | |
Web applications are a prime target for security threats. A solid **threat modeling** process helps identify vulnerabilities early, ensuring your app remains secure. This guide follows industry best practices. | Web applications are a prime target for security threats. A solid **threat modeling** process helps identify vulnerabilities early, ensuring your app remains secure. This guide follows industry best practices. | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
- Document **components** (e.g., authentication systems, third-party integrations). | - Document **components** (e.g., authentication systems, third-party integrations). | ||
− | + | ===Tools=== | |
- Diagrams.net (formerly draw.io) | - Diagrams.net (formerly draw.io) | ||
- OWASP Threat Dragon | - OWASP Threat Dragon | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Identify Potential Threats Using STRIDE== | ==Identify Potential Threats Using STRIDE== | ||
Use the **STRIDE** framework to categorize risks: | Use the **STRIDE** framework to categorize risks: | ||
− | + | {| | |
| **Threat** | **Description** | **Example** | | | **Threat** | **Description** | **Example** | | ||
|------------|---------------|-------------| | |------------|---------------|-------------| | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| **Denial of Service** | Disrupting service | DDoS attacks flooding the application | | | **Denial of Service** | Disrupting service | DDoS attacks flooding the application | | ||
| **Elevation of Privilege** | Gaining higher access | Bypassing access controls to become an admin | | | **Elevation of Privilege** | Gaining higher access | Bypassing access controls to become an admin | | ||
− | + | |} | |
**Recommended Approach:** | **Recommended Approach:** | ||
- **Map attack vectors** for each STRIDE category. | - **Map attack vectors** for each STRIDE category. | ||
- **Assess impact** of each threat scenario. | - **Assess impact** of each threat scenario. | ||
− | + | ===Tools=== | |
- OWASP ZAP | - OWASP ZAP | ||
- Burp Suite | - Burp Suite | ||
- Mitre ATT&CK framework | - Mitre ATT&CK framework | ||
− | |||
==Define Mitigation Strategies== | ==Define Mitigation Strategies== | ||
Line 48: | Line 47: | ||
- **Logging & Monitoring:** Use **SIEM tools** (Splunk, ELK) to detect suspicious behavior. | - **Logging & Monitoring:** Use **SIEM tools** (Splunk, ELK) to detect suspicious behavior. | ||
- **Rate Limiting & Firewalls:** Deploy **WAF** (Cloudflare, AWS Shield) to prevent DDoS. | - **Rate Limiting & Firewalls:** Deploy **WAF** (Cloudflare, AWS Shield) to prevent DDoS. | ||
− | + | ===Tools=== | |
− | |||
- OWASP Dependency Check | - OWASP Dependency Check | ||
- SIEM (Splunk, Elastic Security) | - SIEM (Splunk, Elastic Security) | ||
Line 61: | Line 59: | ||
- Perform **penetration testing** (ethical hacking). | - Perform **penetration testing** (ethical hacking). | ||
- Update **threat models** when infrastructure changes occur. | - Update **threat models** when infrastructure changes occur. | ||
− | + | ===Recommended Practices=== | |
− | + | * Integrate threat modeling into **DevSecOps workflows**. | |
− | + | * Use **CI/CD pipelines** for automated security checks. | |
− | + | * Encourage **security awareness** among developers. | |
− | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
[[Category: Threat]] | [[Category: Threat]] |
Revision as of 17:28, 15 June 2025
Contents
Full Title
Threat Modeling Guide for Web Applications
Web applications are a prime target for security threats. A solid **threat modeling** process helps identify vulnerabilities early, ensuring your app remains secure. This guide follows industry best practices.
---
Understand the Application Architecture
Before modeling threats, map out the web application’s architecture: - Identify **entry points** (e.g., login pages, APIs). - Define **trust boundaries** (e.g., database vs. front-end). - Document **components** (e.g., authentication systems, third-party integrations).
Tools
- Diagrams.net (formerly draw.io) - OWASP Threat Dragon - Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool
---
Identify Potential Threats Using STRIDE
Use the **STRIDE** framework to categorize risks:
**Description** | **Example** | | |||||
Impersonating an entity | Stolen credentials used to access admin portal | | Modifying data | Injection attacks manipulating database entries | | Denying actions | Lack of logging allows attackers to erase footprints | | Exposing sensitive info | Leaked API keys or SQL errors revealing database schema | | Disrupting service | DDoS attacks flooding the application | | Gaining higher access | Bypassing access controls to become an admin | |
- Recommended Approach:**
- **Map attack vectors** for each STRIDE category. - **Assess impact** of each threat scenario.
Tools
- OWASP ZAP - Burp Suite - Mitre ATT&CK framework
Define Mitigation Strategies
To defend against threats: - **Authentication security:** Use **OAuth 2.1** or **FIDO2** for identity management. - **Input validation:** Implement **strict sanitization** to prevent SQL Injection & XSS. - **Encryption & Secure Storage:** Protect data at rest with AES-256 and in transit using TLS 1.3. - **Logging & Monitoring:** Use **SIEM tools** (Splunk, ELK) to detect suspicious behavior. - **Rate Limiting & Firewalls:** Deploy **WAF** (Cloudflare, AWS Shield) to prevent DDoS.
Tools
- OWASP Dependency Check - SIEM (Splunk, Elastic Security) - Web Application Firewalls (ModSecurity, AWS WAF)
---
Validate & Iterate the Model
Threat modeling is **not a one-time process**—it should evolve as the application grows. - Conduct **regular security audits.** - Perform **penetration testing** (ethical hacking). - Update **threat models** when infrastructure changes occur.
Recommended Practices
- Integrate threat modeling into **DevSecOps workflows**.
- Use **CI/CD pipelines** for automated security checks.
- Encourage **security awareness** among developers.