Difference between revisions of "Artificial Consciousness"
From MgmtWiki
(→Context) |
(→Context) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Context== | ==Context== | ||
* In the 1960's there was a ferocious debate about whether any computer could think. The primary objection was that even if it was quite clever, no machine could understand what it did. In other works, no computer could have [[Consciousness]] even if we could not describe what it was. Click on the link ([[Consciousness]]) for more about the controversy. | * In the 1960's there was a ferocious debate about whether any computer could think. The primary objection was that even if it was quite clever, no machine could understand what it did. In other works, no computer could have [[Consciousness]] even if we could not describe what it was. Click on the link ([[Consciousness]]) for more about the controversy. | ||
| − | * | + | * Then in 1974 Thomas Nagel asked What Is It Like to Be a Bat?<ref>Thomas Nagel, ''What Is It Like to Be a Bat?'' The Philosophical Review, '''Vol. 83''', No. 4 (1974-10), pp. 435-450 https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/study/ugmodules/humananimalstudies/lectures/32/nagel_bat.pdf<ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
[[Category: Philosophy]] | [[Category: Philosophy]] | ||
Revision as of 18:41, 11 June 2022
Subtitle
What is it like to be an Artificial Intelligence?
Context
- In the 1960's there was a ferocious debate about whether any computer could think. The primary objection was that even if it was quite clever, no machine could understand what it did. In other works, no computer could have Consciousness even if we could not describe what it was. Click on the link (Consciousness) for more about the controversy.
- Then in 1974 Thomas Nagel asked What Is It Like to Be a Bat?<ref>Thomas Nagel, What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review, Vol. 83, No. 4 (1974-10), pp. 435-450 https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/study/ugmodules/humananimalstudies/lectures/32/nagel_bat.pdf<ref>
