Difference between revisions of "JOSE"
From MgmtWiki
(→Full Title) |
(→Solutions) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Solutions== | ==Solutions== | ||
| − | *The | + | *The IETF Working Group on Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (jose) issued a [https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/jose/about/ final report]. |
*Justin Richer has some suggestions.<ref>Justin Richer, ''Moving On from OAuth 2: A Proposal.'' https://medium.com/@justinsecurity/moving-on-from-oauth-2-629a00133ade</ref> | *Justin Richer has some suggestions.<ref>Justin Richer, ''Moving On from OAuth 2: A Proposal.'' https://medium.com/@justinsecurity/moving-on-from-oauth-2-629a00133ade</ref> | ||
Revision as of 10:47, 22 October 2019
Full Title
Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (jose)
Context
In OAuth 2.0 and other specs from the Open ID Foundation, there was a need for a small packed of identity information that could be coded and include in a HTTP header.
Problems
- The existing specs at the time the JWT was created were XML and SAML which were very wording and not amenable to coding in an HTTP header.
Solutions
- The IETF Working Group on Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (jose) issued a final report.
- Justin Richer has some suggestions.[1]
References
- ↑ Justin Richer, Moving On from OAuth 2: A Proposal. https://medium.com/@justinsecurity/moving-on-from-oauth-2-629a00133ade
Other reference material
- Nimbus JOSE + JWT v6.0 is an open source java library
- JWE - Json Web Encription
- JWT: The Complete Guide to JSON Web Tokens from the folks that brought you angular.
- RFC 6749 The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework specification
- RFC 8252 OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps Specification
