Difference between revisions of "Rationality"

From MgmtWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Context)
(Context)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
important still is the critical attitude which, as I shall try to show,  
 
important still is the critical attitude which, as I shall try to show,  
 
was first developed in the Ionian School.  
 
was first developed in the Ionian School.  
 +
 
The questions which the Pre-Socratics tried to answer were  
 
The questions which the Pre-Socratics tried to answer were  
 
primarily cosmological questions, but they also dealt with  
 
primarily cosmological questions, but they also dealt with  
Line 21: Line 22:
 
philosophy must return to cosmology and to a simple theory of  
 
philosophy must return to cosmology and to a simple theory of  
 
knowledge. There is at least one philosophical problem in  
 
knowledge. There is at least one philosophical problem in  
which all thinking men are interested: the problem of under-
+
which all thinking men are interested: the problem of understanding the world in which we live, including ourselves, who are  
standing the world in which we live, including ourselves, who are  
 
 
part of that world, and our knowledge of it. All science is  
 
part of that world, and our knowledge of it. All science is  
 
cosmology, I believe, and for me the interest of philosophy as  
 
cosmology, I believe, and for me the interest of philosophy as  
well as of science lies solely in their bold attempt to add to our  
+
well as of science lies solely in their bold attempt to add to our knowledge of the world, and to the theory of our knowledge of  
knowledge of the world, and to the theory of our knowledge of  
 
 
the world. I am interested in Wittgenstein, for example, not  
 
the world. I am interested in Wittgenstein, for example, not  
 
because of his linguistic philosophy, but because his Tractatus  
 
because of his linguistic philosophy, but because his Tractatus  
Line 32: Line 31:
 
was closely linked with his cosmology.  
 
was closely linked with his cosmology.  
 
For me, philosophy as well as science lose all attraction when  
 
For me, philosophy as well as science lose all attraction when  
they give up that pursuit—when they become specialisms and
+
they give up that pursuit—when they become specialists.
  
 
==Refences==
 
==Refences==
  
 
[[Category: Philosophy]]
 
[[Category: Philosophy]]

Revision as of 14:49, 8 September 2022

Full Title or Meme

Rationality = As a basis for decision process Rationality as been assumed to be essentially. Unfortunately, rationality can be extrinsic, or based on external knowledge obtained inductively from the exiting ecosystems, or intrinsic, or based on a person's internal value system. The mixture of these two modes of thought in one person make rational decisions dependent on circumstances and not deterministic.

Context

BACK TO THE PRE-SOCRATICS By KARL R. POPPER

BACK TO METHUSELAH ' was a progressive program, com- pared with ' Back to Thales what Shaw offered us was an improved expectation of life—something that was in the air, at any rate when he wrote. I have nothing to offer you, I am afraid, that is in the air to-day; for what I want to return to is the simple straightforward rationality of the Pre-Socratics. The simplicity and boldness of their questions is part of it, but more important still is the critical attitude which, as I shall try to show, was first developed in the Ionian School.

The questions which the Pre-Socratics tried to answer were primarily cosmological questions, but they also dealt with questions of the theory of knowledge. It is my belief that philosophy must return to cosmology and to a simple theory of knowledge. There is at least one philosophical problem in which all thinking men are interested: the problem of understanding the world in which we live, including ourselves, who are part of that world, and our knowledge of it. All science is cosmology, I believe, and for me the interest of philosophy as well as of science lies solely in their bold attempt to add to our knowledge of the world, and to the theory of our knowledge of the world. I am interested in Wittgenstein, for example, not because of his linguistic philosophy, but because his Tractatus was a cosmological treatise, and because his theory of knowledge was closely linked with his cosmology. For me, philosophy as well as science lose all attraction when they give up that pursuit—when they become specialists.

Refences