Difference between revisions of "User Risk"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Full Title or Meme== | ==Full Title or Meme== | ||
| − | There are two ways to look at [[]]: from the user's point of view and from the counter-parties point of view. This page creates too distinct sections base on the point of view. | + | There are two ways to look at [[User Risk]]: from the user's point of view and from the counter-parties point of view. This page creates too distinct sections base on the point of view. |
==Form the user's point of view== | ==Form the user's point of view== | ||
==From the counter-party's point of view== | ==From the counter-party's point of view== | ||
Revision as of 18:54, 11 April 2024
Contents
Full Title or Meme
There are two ways to look at User Risk: from the user's point of view and from the counter-parties point of view. This page creates too distinct sections base on the point of view.
Form the user's point of view
From the counter-party's point of view
Typically the user behavior is the biggest source of risk, and that includes both the case where the user is inside the counter party or at the other end of the transaction.
Attention
Fraud
When it comes to fraud, striking the right balance between security and friction is a balancing act. As authentication measures have become widely incorporated in our digital payments experience, they serve as a means to enhance security and protect against fraudulent activities. With enhanced methods and capabilities leading to the development of various implementations, we've seen terms like multi-factor authentication (MFA), strong customer authentication (SCA), and step-up authentication gaining prominence.
