Difference between revisions of "Best Practice in HealthCare"
(→Patient Experience) |
(→Information Sharing) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[FHIR]], pronounced 'fire' is working on [[Information Sharing]] [[API]]s, but has not yet dealt with [[Federated Trust]]. | [[FHIR]], pronounced 'fire' is working on [[Information Sharing]] [[API]]s, but has not yet dealt with [[Federated Trust]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Federated Trust Anchor=== | ||
+ | *It is likely that a single anchor for a country's health ecosystem is required where any patient or provider can learn the status of any [[Web Site]] by providing metadata about the entity that operates the [[Web Site]]. | ||
+ | *It is likely that the entity operating the [[Web Site]] will not be the health service [[Provider]], and so a "On-behalf-of" [[Identifier]] is likely to be required as well. | ||
+ | |||
===Patient's Rights=== | ===Patient's Rights=== | ||
Deborah C. Peel, MD Founder and President Patient Privacy Rights | Deborah C. Peel, MD Founder and President Patient Privacy Rights |
Revision as of 09:50, 8 April 2019
Contents
Full Title or Meme
Best Practice Use Cases in HealthCare
Context
healthcare interoperability has been a great pain point to date with one of the primary barriers being the lack of a true business incentive to compel providers and EHR developers to be “open” with this ever-so-important data. To this end, in recent proposed regulations, federal health leaders have clamped down, perhaps harder than ever before, in their ongoing effort to guide stakeholders to a world in which seamless health data exchange is the norm, rather than a rarity.
Problems
In the absence of a single payer health care network, the US is blessed with a plethora of solutions, but plagued with the resultant lack of interoperability.
Solutions
Information Sharing
It is generally agreed that it is better for doctors to have a full set of patient health histories to enable adequate care, especially in life-or-death emergency cases.
FHIR, pronounced 'fire' is working on Information Sharing APIs, but has not yet dealt with Federated Trust.
Federated Trust Anchor
- It is likely that a single anchor for a country's health ecosystem is required where any patient or provider can learn the status of any Web Site by providing metadata about the entity that operates the Web Site.
- It is likely that the entity operating the Web Site will not be the health service Provider, and so a "On-behalf-of" Identifier is likely to be required as well.
Patient's Rights
Deborah C. Peel, MD Founder and President Patient Privacy Rights
www.patientprivacyrights.org
https://patientprivacyrights.org/health-privacy-summit/
Patient Experience
The best Patient Experience will not be delivered by focusing on Patient's legal rights.
References
- The H-ISAC Healthcare Information Sharing and Analysis Center provides a forum for coordinating, collaborating and sharing vital Physical and Cyber Threat Intelligence and best practices with each other.
- Healthcare Informatics is an on-line magazine.
- The The Strategic Health Information Exchange Collaborative (SHIEC) is the national collaborative representing health information exchanges (HIEs) and their strategic business and technology partners.
- The College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME) seems to be pushing back on greater integration in health care.
- Authenticate Node section 19 of (2018-07-24) IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework primarily relies on mutual authentication with no specific trust anchor other than X.509 certificate chains.