Difference between revisions of "Chaos and Order"
(→Context) |
(→Chaord) |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Context== | ==Context== | ||
| − | In The Function of Reason A.N.Whitehead claims that “History discloses two main tendencies in the course of events. One tendency is exemplified in the slow decay of physical nature…The other tendency is exemplified by the yearly renewal of nature in the spring, and by the upward course of biological [[Evolution]].” The ‘downward’ tendency is towards increasingly stable states of [[Equilibrium]] (as exemplified in the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]]), while the ‘upward’ tendency is towards increasing orders of | + | In The Function of Reason A.N.Whitehead claims that “History discloses two main tendencies in the course of events. One tendency is exemplified in the slow decay of physical nature…The other tendency is exemplified by the yearly renewal of nature in the spring, and by the upward course of biological [[Evolution]].” The ‘downward’ tendency is towards increasingly stable states of [[Equilibrium]] (as exemplified in the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]]), while the ‘upward’ tendency is towards increasing orders of [[Complexity]] (as exemplified in biological forms of life). These tendencies can be found at all levels of being, from the day-to-day cycles of an individual organism to the [[Evolution]] of the cosmos. Viewed cosmologically, for example, the current cycle or phase of the universe suggests that the ‘downward’ tendency is most prominent, but we can expect the upward tendency to have been more prominent in the distant past and to become more prominent again in the future. The upward tendency is manifest in the active manner in which living things relate to their environments; organisms not only adapt to their environments, they also “have progressively undertaken the task of adapting the environment to themselves.” This active transformative aspect of things is the expression of a “three-fold urge: (i) to live, (ii) to live well, (iii) to live better.” This three-fold urge is a central feature of the art of life First to be alive, secondly to be alive in a satisfactory way, and thirdly to acquire an increase in satisfaction.” It is here that Reason enters the picture, for the principal “ The function of Reason is to promote the Art of Life. Reason accomplishes this by serving as “the self-discipline of the origin active element in history. Apart from the operations of Reason, this element is anarchic.”<ref>A.N. Whitehead, '' The Function of Reason'' (1929; reissued, Boston: Beacon Press, 1958) ASIN B01FIY9Y2C </ref> |
| − | But even before life had started its struggle against Chaos, the earth itself had been subject to great upheavals as continents slide around, mountain rose, only to ground down into sand. Only the Earth, among the solar planets has such continental activity which gave rise to a surprising amount of order in the minerals that we mine today for our technological wonders. Also we know know that nearly half of all minerals are biogenic - | + | But even before life had started its struggle against Chaos, the earth itself had been subject to great upheavals as continents slide around, mountain rose, only to be ground down into sand. Only the Earth, among the solar planets, has such continental activity which gave rise to a surprising amount of order in the minerals that we mine today for our technological wonders. Also we know know that nearly half of all minerals are biogenic - that is, their formation depends in one way of another on some living species.<ref>Marcia Bjornerud, ''Turning to Stone'' Flatiron 2024-08-13 ISBN 978-1250875891 </ref> The really astonishing thing about the relationship between us and out planet is not the mismatch, but the match. The Earth is already fifty million times older than you or I - and yet, given some sandstone and granite, some tektites and tuff, some fragments of flint and crystals of zircon, we can infer its entire 4.5 billion-year history. Just the inventive human find can represent scales of existence wildly different from our own. Our brain acts like a time machine allowing us to see so far into the past and into the future, at least for those things that move slowly, like tectonic plates. |
| + | |||
| + | A fully functional human body operates at the highest level of order that we have experience so far. In medicine there are to disruptions to this order, disease which is a problem with a known cause and disorder which has, as yet, no known cause. | ||
==Problems== | ==Problems== | ||
| − | * The [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]] appears to be quite pessimistic about the future of any closed system, like the universe. Every such system is in a constant state of running down, headed to complete disorder. | + | * The [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]] appears to be quite pessimistic about the future of any closed system, like the universe. Every such system is in a constant state of running down, headed to complete disorder, or the highest entropy. |
* Humans generally fare poorly in chaotic environment, even though it seems that we owe our very existence to environmental changes that gave a distinct evolutionary advantage to those with big brains that were capable of reasoning and abstract thought. | * Humans generally fare poorly in chaotic environment, even though it seems that we owe our very existence to environmental changes that gave a distinct evolutionary advantage to those with big brains that were capable of reasoning and abstract thought. | ||
| − | * When rapid changes occurs in a social structure, those that are comfortable in the old order resist the change and use chaos as something to be avoided at all costs. For example after the first world war in the US laws against [[Evolution]], against change, brouhgt about one of the great conflicts into the courtroom as the Scopes Monkey Trial.<ref>Brenda Wineapple, ''Keeping the Faith: God, Democracy, and the Trial That Riveted a Nation'' Random House (2024-08-13) ASIN B0CPTCGB67 ISBN 978-0593229927</ref> The result in that trial was a vote for order versus change with [[Evolution]] as the proponent of change. Campaigning for the US presidency in 1920 Warren G Harding had promised "a return to normalcy", to the better times of the past. | + | * When rapid changes occurs in a social structure, those that are comfortable in the old order resist the change and use chaos as something to be avoided at all costs. For example after the first world war in the US laws against [[Evolution]], against change, brouhgt about one of the great conflicts into the courtroom as the Scopes Monkey Trial.<ref>Brenda Wineapple, ''Keeping the Faith: God, Democracy, and the Trial That Riveted a Nation'' Random House (2024-08-13) ASIN B0CPTCGB67 ISBN 978-0593229927</ref> The result in that trial was a vote for order versus change with [[Evolution]] as the proponent of change. Campaigning for the US presidency in 1920 Warren G Harding had promised "a return to normalcy", to the better times of the past. What he got was world war I. |
| + | ===Thermal Equilibrium=== | ||
| + | In everyday language, thermalization is the natural tendency for systems to get mixed up. A new deck of cards quickly loses its original order. A sandcastle winds up as a wet lump of sand. In thermodynamics, this trend is a straightforward consequence of statistics. There are just a few ways to be ordered and a tremendous number of ways to be mixed up, so an initially ordered system is extremely likely to end up mixed. The key feature of thermalization is that any initial patterns get wiped out by the mixing. Any initial hot spot or concentration of energy, for instance, spreads out until no further spreading is possible. At this point, the system becomes stable and stops noticeably changing — a scenario physicists refer to as thermal equilibrium. | ||
==Solutions== | ==Solutions== | ||
| − | At a conference of physicists and philosopher John Wheeler gave one of his excellent descriptions of the current model of [[Quantum Mechanics]]. <ref>WILLIAM W. BARTLEY, ''Philosophy of Biology versus Philosophy of Physics'' Fundamenta Scientiae, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 55-78, (1982) http://www.the-rathouse.com/Bartley/Biology-vs-Philos-of-Physics.html</ref> Karl Popper turned to Wheeler and quietly said: "What you say is contradicted by biology." What he could have equally said is that reality is always contradicting the models that humans make of nature. We need to be able to remember humbly the words of the statistician George Box,<ref>George Box, a model statistician https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2010.00442.x</ref> "all models are wrong, but some are useful." | + | * At a conference of physicists and philosopher John Wheeler gave one of his excellent descriptions of the current model of [[Quantum Mechanics]]. <ref>WILLIAM W. BARTLEY, ''Philosophy of Biology versus Philosophy of Physics'' Fundamenta Scientiae, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 55-78, (1982) http://www.the-rathouse.com/Bartley/Biology-vs-Philos-of-Physics.html</ref> Karl Popper turned to Wheeler and quietly said: "What you say is contradicted by biology." What he could have equally said is that reality is always contradicting the models that humans make of nature. We need to be able to remember humbly the words of the statistician George Box,<ref>George Box, a model statistician https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2010.00442.x</ref> "all models are wrong, but some are useful." |
| + | * Ramsey Theory shows very specifically how many options can exist before some sort of order must occur. In this sense order is not so much spontaneous as it is inevitable. | ||
| + | ===Stable Phases=== | ||
| + | [[Phase Transitions]] occur when a substance changes from one state (phase) to another due to variations in temperature, pressure, or other external. In order to study phase transitions at the microscopic level, we need to understand the behavior of during the transitions. Many-body localization, or MBL (described in the wiki page [[Phase Transitions]]) John Imbrie showed in 2014 that if you could string together an infinitely long chain of particles with enough disorder, any configuration would stay localized. Despite the ability of the particles to interact with their neighbors, they would individually continue to do their own thing forever. | ||
| + | ===Chaord=== | ||
| + | A chaord is a term coined by Dee Hock, founder of the Visa credit card association. It's a system that balances both chaos and order in a harmonious way, allowing for creativity and structure. In a chaordic organization or system, there's a delicate dance between these two elements, which can lead to more effective and innovative outcomes. <ref>Dee Hock, ''Birth of the Choardic Age'' ISBN 1576750744</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 33: | ||
[[Category: Philosophy]] | [[Category: Philosophy]] | ||
| + | [[Category: Physics]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:50, 13 November 2024
Contents
Full Title.or Meme
The Universe is a constant struggle of Order against Chaos.
Chaos was the law of nature, order was the dream of man. - Henry Adams
Context
In The Function of Reason A.N.Whitehead claims that “History discloses two main tendencies in the course of events. One tendency is exemplified in the slow decay of physical nature…The other tendency is exemplified by the yearly renewal of nature in the spring, and by the upward course of biological Evolution.” The ‘downward’ tendency is towards increasingly stable states of Equilibrium (as exemplified in the Second Law of Thermodynamics), while the ‘upward’ tendency is towards increasing orders of Complexity (as exemplified in biological forms of life). These tendencies can be found at all levels of being, from the day-to-day cycles of an individual organism to the Evolution of the cosmos. Viewed cosmologically, for example, the current cycle or phase of the universe suggests that the ‘downward’ tendency is most prominent, but we can expect the upward tendency to have been more prominent in the distant past and to become more prominent again in the future. The upward tendency is manifest in the active manner in which living things relate to their environments; organisms not only adapt to their environments, they also “have progressively undertaken the task of adapting the environment to themselves.” This active transformative aspect of things is the expression of a “three-fold urge: (i) to live, (ii) to live well, (iii) to live better.” This three-fold urge is a central feature of the art of life First to be alive, secondly to be alive in a satisfactory way, and thirdly to acquire an increase in satisfaction.” It is here that Reason enters the picture, for the principal “ The function of Reason is to promote the Art of Life. Reason accomplishes this by serving as “the self-discipline of the origin active element in history. Apart from the operations of Reason, this element is anarchic.”[1]
But even before life had started its struggle against Chaos, the earth itself had been subject to great upheavals as continents slide around, mountain rose, only to be ground down into sand. Only the Earth, among the solar planets, has such continental activity which gave rise to a surprising amount of order in the minerals that we mine today for our technological wonders. Also we know know that nearly half of all minerals are biogenic - that is, their formation depends in one way of another on some living species.[2] The really astonishing thing about the relationship between us and out planet is not the mismatch, but the match. The Earth is already fifty million times older than you or I - and yet, given some sandstone and granite, some tektites and tuff, some fragments of flint and crystals of zircon, we can infer its entire 4.5 billion-year history. Just the inventive human find can represent scales of existence wildly different from our own. Our brain acts like a time machine allowing us to see so far into the past and into the future, at least for those things that move slowly, like tectonic plates.
A fully functional human body operates at the highest level of order that we have experience so far. In medicine there are to disruptions to this order, disease which is a problem with a known cause and disorder which has, as yet, no known cause.
Problems
- The Second Law of Thermodynamics appears to be quite pessimistic about the future of any closed system, like the universe. Every such system is in a constant state of running down, headed to complete disorder, or the highest entropy.
- Humans generally fare poorly in chaotic environment, even though it seems that we owe our very existence to environmental changes that gave a distinct evolutionary advantage to those with big brains that were capable of reasoning and abstract thought.
- When rapid changes occurs in a social structure, those that are comfortable in the old order resist the change and use chaos as something to be avoided at all costs. For example after the first world war in the US laws against Evolution, against change, brouhgt about one of the great conflicts into the courtroom as the Scopes Monkey Trial.[3] The result in that trial was a vote for order versus change with Evolution as the proponent of change. Campaigning for the US presidency in 1920 Warren G Harding had promised "a return to normalcy", to the better times of the past. What he got was world war I.
Thermal Equilibrium
In everyday language, thermalization is the natural tendency for systems to get mixed up. A new deck of cards quickly loses its original order. A sandcastle winds up as a wet lump of sand. In thermodynamics, this trend is a straightforward consequence of statistics. There are just a few ways to be ordered and a tremendous number of ways to be mixed up, so an initially ordered system is extremely likely to end up mixed. The key feature of thermalization is that any initial patterns get wiped out by the mixing. Any initial hot spot or concentration of energy, for instance, spreads out until no further spreading is possible. At this point, the system becomes stable and stops noticeably changing — a scenario physicists refer to as thermal equilibrium.
Solutions
- At a conference of physicists and philosopher John Wheeler gave one of his excellent descriptions of the current model of Quantum Mechanics. [4] Karl Popper turned to Wheeler and quietly said: "What you say is contradicted by biology." What he could have equally said is that reality is always contradicting the models that humans make of nature. We need to be able to remember humbly the words of the statistician George Box,[5] "all models are wrong, but some are useful."
- Ramsey Theory shows very specifically how many options can exist before some sort of order must occur. In this sense order is not so much spontaneous as it is inevitable.
Stable Phases
Phase Transitions occur when a substance changes from one state (phase) to another due to variations in temperature, pressure, or other external. In order to study phase transitions at the microscopic level, we need to understand the behavior of during the transitions. Many-body localization, or MBL (described in the wiki page Phase Transitions) John Imbrie showed in 2014 that if you could string together an infinitely long chain of particles with enough disorder, any configuration would stay localized. Despite the ability of the particles to interact with their neighbors, they would individually continue to do their own thing forever.
Chaord
A chaord is a term coined by Dee Hock, founder of the Visa credit card association. It's a system that balances both chaos and order in a harmonious way, allowing for creativity and structure. In a chaordic organization or system, there's a delicate dance between these two elements, which can lead to more effective and innovative outcomes. [6]
References
- ↑ A.N. Whitehead, The Function of Reason (1929; reissued, Boston: Beacon Press, 1958) ASIN B01FIY9Y2C
- ↑ Marcia Bjornerud, Turning to Stone Flatiron 2024-08-13 ISBN 978-1250875891
- ↑ Brenda Wineapple, Keeping the Faith: God, Democracy, and the Trial That Riveted a Nation Random House (2024-08-13) ASIN B0CPTCGB67 ISBN 978-0593229927
- ↑ WILLIAM W. BARTLEY, Philosophy of Biology versus Philosophy of Physics Fundamenta Scientiae, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 55-78, (1982) http://www.the-rathouse.com/Bartley/Biology-vs-Philos-of-Physics.html
- ↑ George Box, a model statistician https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2010.00442.x
- ↑ Dee Hock, Birth of the Choardic Age ISBN 1576750744
More Material
- See more detail in the page on Complexity
